linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	rafael@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 074/116] PM: runtime: Add safety net to supplier device release
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 21:39:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220118024007.1950576-74-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118024007.1950576-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit d1579e61192e0e686faa4208500ef4c3b529b16c ]

Because refcount_dec_not_one() returns true if the target refcount
becomes saturated, it is generally unsafe to use its return value as
a loop termination condition, but that is what happens when a device
link's supplier device is released during runtime PM suspend
operations and on device link removal.

To address this, introduce pm_runtime_release_supplier() to be used
in the above cases which will check the supplier device's runtime
PM usage counter in addition to the refcount_dec_not_one() return
value, so the loop can be terminated in case the rpm_active refcount
value becomes invalid, and update the code in question to use it as
appropriate.

This change is not expected to have any visible functional impact.

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/base/core.c          |  3 +--
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/pm_runtime.h   |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 389d13616d1df..c0566aff53551 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -348,8 +348,7 @@ static void device_link_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	/* Ensure that all references to the link object have been dropped. */
 	device_link_synchronize_removal();
 
-	while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
-		pm_runtime_put(link->supplier);
+	pm_runtime_release_supplier(link, true);
 
 	put_device(link->consumer);
 	put_device(link->supplier);
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index bc649da4899a0..1573319404888 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -305,19 +305,40 @@ static int rpm_get_suppliers(struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * pm_runtime_release_supplier - Drop references to device link's supplier.
+ * @link: Target device link.
+ * @check_idle: Whether or not to check if the supplier device is idle.
+ *
+ * Drop all runtime PM references associated with @link to its supplier device
+ * and if @check_idle is set, check if that device is idle (and so it can be
+ * suspended).
+ */
+void pm_runtime_release_supplier(struct device_link *link, bool check_idle)
+{
+	struct device *supplier = link->supplier;
+
+	/*
+	 * The additional power.usage_count check is a safety net in case
+	 * the rpm_active refcount becomes saturated, in which case
+	 * refcount_dec_not_one() would return true forever, but it is not
+	 * strictly necessary.
+	 */
+	while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active) &&
+	       atomic_read(&supplier->power.usage_count) > 0)
+		pm_runtime_put_noidle(supplier);
+
+	if (check_idle)
+		pm_request_idle(supplier);
+}
+
 static void __rpm_put_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool try_to_suspend)
 {
 	struct device_link *link;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node,
-				device_links_read_lock_held()) {
-
-		while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
-			pm_runtime_put_noidle(link->supplier);
-
-		if (try_to_suspend)
-			pm_request_idle(link->supplier);
-	}
+				device_links_read_lock_held())
+		pm_runtime_release_supplier(link, try_to_suspend);
 }
 
 static void rpm_put_suppliers(struct device *dev)
@@ -1755,9 +1776,7 @@ void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device_link *link)
 		return;
 
 	pm_runtime_drop_link_count(link->consumer);
-
-	while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
-		pm_runtime_put(link->supplier);
+	pm_runtime_release_supplier(link, true);
 }
 
 static bool pm_runtime_need_not_resume(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
index 161acd4ede448..30091ab5de287 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ extern void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev);
 extern void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev);
 extern void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *dev);
 extern void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device_link *link);
+extern void pm_runtime_release_supplier(struct device_link *link, bool check_idle);
 
 /**
  * pm_runtime_get_if_in_use - Conditionally bump up runtime PM usage counter.
@@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ static inline void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev) {}
 static inline void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev) {}
 static inline void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *dev) {}
 static inline void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device_link *link) {}
+static inline void pm_runtime_release_supplier(struct device_link *link,
+					       bool check_idle) {}
 
 #endif /* !CONFIG_PM */
 
-- 
2.34.1


       reply	other threads:[~2022-01-18  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220118024007.1950576-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2022-01-18  2:39 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2022-01-18  2:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 075/116] cpufreq: Fix initialization of min and max frequency QoS requests Sasha Levin
2022-01-18  2:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 079/116] PM: AVS: qcom-cpr: Use div64_ul instead of do_div Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220118024007.1950576-74-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).