From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE44C433EF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243406AbiC3Mln (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:41:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345449AbiC3Mlb (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:41:31 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01189EE4D4; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 05:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KT5MM1vyfz67NYQ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:28:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:30:39 +0200 Received: from localhost (10.47.70.51) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:30:39 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:30:37 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Jonathan Cameron , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , Paul Cercueil , Lorenzo Bianconi , "Tomasz Duszynski" , Linux PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: core: Add NS varients of EXPORT[_GPL]_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS and runtime pm equiv Message-ID: <20220330133037.000044b2@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20220301113145.00004ce4@Huawei.com> References: <20220220181522.541718-1-jic23@kernel.org> <20220220181522.541718-3-jic23@kernel.org> <6cd17744-d060-1094-098d-e30a10f96600@intel.com> <20220227114628.219c7055@jic23-huawei> <20220301113145.00004ce4@Huawei.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.29; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.47.70.51] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:31:45 +0000 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:13:25 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 12:39 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:37:57 +0100 > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > CC: linux-pm > > > > > > Oops. Stupid omission on my part, sorry about that! > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/20/2022 7:15 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > From: Jonathan Cameron > > > > > > > > > > As more drivers start to use namespaces, we need to have varients of these > > > > > useful macros that allow the export to be in a particular namespace. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > > > Cc: Paul Cercueil > > > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > > > I'd rather route this through linux-pm unless you have dependent changes. > > > > > > Ok. > > > > > > The kxsd9 patch (4) is dependent on other changes queued for > > > the merge window in IIO. If we want to do it through linux-pm I'd > > > love it if we can manage to get the ground work in for the coming merge window. > > > > > > So options are: > > > > > > 1) This patch alone via linux-pm and I queue the users up for next cycle > > > Fine by me but always awkward to have infrastructure with no users. > > > 2) First 3 patches via linux-pm so we have a user (scd30) in a low churn > > > driver and I'll queue the rest for 5.19. Fine by me as well. > > > That goes on cleanly on 5.17-rc1 and there is nothing else in my review > > > queue touching that driver. > > > > That would work for me. > > Great. Let's do that then. Are you fine picking them from this thread, or > would you like me to resend with just those 3 patches as a fresh series? Hi Rafael, I've not heard back from you, so have been assuming you'd pick those first 3 patches up from this series. Is that a correct assumption? Thanks, Jonathan > > > > > > I'm also interested to hear your view on the discussion going on in reply > > > to the cover letter. Specifically Paul suggested we 'only' have the > > > namespaced versions of these macros. > > > > Well, I'm a bit afraid that providing the namespaced versions only > > would slow down the adoption. > > Agreed, that's a concern and as Paul was happy with the route of > adding NS and perhaps looking eventually at dropping the non NS variant > I think we can move forward with this patch. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > >