From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/4] thermal: intel: pch: enhance overheat handling
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 22:35:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519143508.3803894-4-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519143508.3803894-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>
Commit ef63b043ac86 ("thermal: intel: pch: fix S0ix failure due to PCH
temperature above threshold") introduces delay loop mechanism that allows
PCH temperature to go down below threshold during suspend so it won't
block S0ix. And the default overall delay timeout is 1 second.
However, in practice, we found that the time it takes to cool the PCH down
below threshold highly depends on the initial PCH temperature when the
delay starts, as well as the ambient temperature.
And in some cases, the 1 second delay is not sufficient. As a result, the
system stays in a shallower power state like PCx instead of S0ix, and
drains the battery power, without user' notice.
To make sure S0ix is not blocked by the PCH overheating, we
1. expand the default overall timeout to 60 seconds.
2. make sure the temperature is below threshold rather than equal to it.
At the same time, as the cooling delay can be much longer and many wakeup
events (ACPI Power Button press, USB mouse move, etc) becomes valid in the
suspend_noirq phase, add detection of wakeup event so that the driver
does not delay blindly when the system suspend is likely to abort soon.
This patch may introduce longer suspend time, but only in the cases when
the system overheats and Linux used to enter a shallower S2idle state,
say, PCx instead of S0ix.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
index c0f651b5905d..b7b32e2f5ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ static unsigned int delay_timeout = 100;
module_param(delay_timeout, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(delay_timeout, "amount of time delay for each iteration.");
-/* Number of iterations for cooling delay, 10 counts by default for now */
-static unsigned int delay_cnt = 10;
+/* Number of iterations for cooling delay, 600 counts by default for now */
+static unsigned int delay_cnt = 600;
module_param(delay_cnt, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(delay_cnt, "total number of iterations for time delay.");
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int pch_wpt_get_temp(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd, int *temp)
static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd)
{
u8 tsel;
- u8 pch_delay_cnt = 1;
+ int pch_delay_cnt = 1;
u16 pch_thr_temp, pch_cur_temp;
/* Shutdown the thermal sensor if it is not enabled by BIOS */
@@ -234,7 +234,10 @@ static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd)
* which helps to indentify the reason why S0ix entry was rejected.
*/
while (pch_delay_cnt <= delay_cnt) {
- if (pch_cur_temp <= pch_thr_temp)
+ if (pch_cur_temp < pch_thr_temp)
+ break;
+
+ if (pm_wakeup_pending())
break;
dev_warn(&ptd->pdev->dev,
@@ -246,7 +249,7 @@ static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd)
pch_delay_cnt++;
}
- if (pch_cur_temp > pch_thr_temp)
+ if (pch_cur_temp >= pch_thr_temp)
dev_warn(&ptd->pdev->dev,
"CPU-PCH is hot [%dC] even after delay, continue to suspend. S0ix might fail\n",
pch_cur_temp);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 14:35 [PATCH V2 0/4] PM/Thermal: Enhance PCH overheat handling Zhang Rui
2022-05-19 14:35 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] PM: wakeup: expose pm_wakeup_pending to modules Zhang Rui
2022-05-19 14:35 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] thermal: intel: pch: move cooling delay to suspend_noirq phase Zhang Rui
2022-05-19 14:35 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2022-05-19 14:35 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] thermal: intel: pch: improve the cooling delay log Zhang Rui
2022-05-19 17:42 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] PM/Thermal: Enhance PCH overheat handling Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519143508.3803894-4-rui.zhang@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox