From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
To: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: opp-v2: Fix clock-latency-ns prop in example
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:43:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107204355.31971-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> (raw)
Accidentally discovered a hidden typo in the DT-nodes defined in the
opp-v2 bindings example. Instead of specifying the "clock-latency-ns"
property the DT-node has been created with the "lock-latency-ns" property
in it, which doesn't exist neither in opp-v2 nor in the base schemas.
Let's fix the name to having the "clock-" prefix as it was originally
implied and as the rest of the similar nodes has.
Fixes: 94274f20f6bf ("dt-bindings: opp: Convert to DT schema")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
---
Note unevaluatedProperties flag hasn't revealed the problem here most
likely due to the property having the "-ns" suffix which implies the
property being single-number. It is implicitly evaluated by the dt-schema
core thus preventing the unevaluatedProperties schema to detect the
inconsistency.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml
index eaf8fba2c691..2f05920fce79 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ examples:
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
opp-microvolt = <1025000>;
opp-microamp = <90000>;
- lock-latency-ns = <290000>;
+ clock-latency-ns = <290000>;
turbo-mode;
};
};
--
2.38.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 20:43 Serge Semin [this message]
2022-11-08 4:20 ` [PATCH] dt-bindings: opp-v2: Fix clock-latency-ns prop in example Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221107204355.31971-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--to=sergey.semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox