From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:DEVICE FREQUENCY (DEVFREQ)),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/11] PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:01:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822180208.95556-3-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822180208.95556-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
This will make it easier to catch places doing allocations that can
trigger reclaim under devfreq->lock.
Because devfreq->lock is held over various devfreq_dev_profile
callbacks, there might be some fallout if those callbacks do allocations
that can trigger reclaim, but I've looked through the various callback
implementations and don't see anything obvious. If it does trigger any
lockdep splats, those should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index e5558ec68ce8..81add6064406 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -817,6 +817,12 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
}
mutex_init(&devfreq->lock);
+
+ /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
+ fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+ might_lock(&devfreq->lock);
+ fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+
devfreq->dev.parent = dev;
devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class;
devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release;
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 18:01 [PATCH v5 00/11] drm/msm+PM+icc: Make job_run() reclaim-safe Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` Rob Clark [this message]
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-22 19:41 ` Rob Clark
2023-08-23 21:01 ` Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx Rob Clark
2023-09-22 7:14 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim Rob Clark
2023-08-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230822180208.95556-3-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).