From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add generic OPP support to the SCMI performance domain
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:06:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231005150649.p6viyorcucq2irsi@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004050806.sba3ogq76yiylrro@vireshk-i7>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:38:06AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-10-23, 12:26, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:51:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 29-09-23, 17:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:17:15PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > > To allow a consumer driver to use the OPP library to scale the performance
> > > > > for its device, let's dynamically add the OPP table when the device gets
> > > > > attached to its SCMI performance domain.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The SCMI changes(patches 7-9) look fine to me. Rafael was fine with genpd
> > > > changes, Viresh if you are OK with OPP changes I can take it via SCMI as
> > > > there are some dependent patches as Ulf has pointed out in the cover letter.
> > >
> > > I would like to take OPP patches via my tree as there are some changes in my
> > > tree and I plan to add some more changes on top of this. I can give an immutable
> > > branch though.
> > >
> >
> > Works for me. Please do share it once you have it ready.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git opp/pm-domain-scmi
>
Thanks, I wasn't expecting these patches in the branch, but if you are
aware off and are fine with it, I have no objections.
dt-bindings: opp: opp-v2-kryo-cpu: Allow opp-peak-kBps
OPP: debugfs: Fix warning with W=1 builds
OPP: Remove doc style comments for internal routines
OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_find_level_floor()
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 13:17 [PATCH 0/9] PM: domains/opp/arm_scmi: Extend performance scaling support Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 1/9] PM: domains: Introduce dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 2/9] PM: domains: Implement the ->set_performance_state() callback for genpd Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 3/9] OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_add_dynamic() to allow more flexibility Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 4/9] OPP: Extend dev_pm_opp_data with a level Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] OPP: Switch to use dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] OPP: Extend support for the opp-level beyond required-opps Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:33 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-03 8:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-03 12:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-04 5:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-04 9:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Simplify error path in scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add() Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Specify the performance level when adding an OPP Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 13:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add generic OPP support to the SCMI performance domain Ulf Hansson
2023-09-29 16:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-03 8:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-03 11:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04 5:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-05 15:06 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2023-10-06 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-06 9:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-26 16:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: domains/opp/arm_scmi: Extend performance scaling support Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-10-06 14:30 ` (subset) " Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231005150649.p6viyorcucq2irsi@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox