linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] x86: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:32:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124223226.24249-2-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124223226.24249-1-frederic@kernel.org>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

intel_idle_irq() re-enables IRQs very early. As a result, an interrupt
may fire before mwait() is eventually called. If such an interrupt queues
a timer, it may go unnoticed until mwait returns and the idle loop
handles the tick re-evaluation. And monitoring TIF_NEED_RESCHED doesn't
help because a local timer enqueue doesn't set that flag.

The issue is mitigated by the fact that this idle handler is only invoked
for shallow C-states when, presumably, the next tick is supposed to be
close enough. There may still be rare cases though when the next tick
is far away and the selected C-state is shallow, resulting in a timer
getting ignored for a while.

Fix this with using sti_mwait() whose IRQ-reenablement only triggers
upon calling mwait(), dealing with the race while keeping the interrupt
latency within acceptable bounds.

Fixes: c227233ad64c (intel_idle: enable interrupts before C1 on Xeons)
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h | 11 +++++++++--
 drivers/idle/intel_idle.c    | 19 +++++++------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
index 778df05f8539..bae83810505b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
@@ -115,8 +115,15 @@ static __always_inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long eax, unsigned lo
 		}
 
 		__monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
-		if (!need_resched())
-			__mwait(eax, ecx);
+
+		if (!need_resched()) {
+			if (ecx & 1) {
+				__mwait(eax, ecx);
+			} else {
+				__sti_mwait(eax, ecx);
+				raw_local_irq_disable();
+			}
+		}
 	}
 	current_clr_polling();
 }
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index dcda0afecfc5..3e01a6b23e75 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ static unsigned int mwait_substates __initdata;
 #define MWAIT2flg(eax) ((eax & 0xFF) << 24)
 
 static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
-					struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
+					struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+					int index, bool irqoff)
 {
 	struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[index];
 	unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
-	unsigned long ecx = 1; /* break on interrupt flag */
+	unsigned long ecx = 1*irqoff; /* break on interrupt flag */
 
 	mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
 
@@ -159,19 +160,13 @@ static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 				struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
 {
-	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
 }
 
 static __cpuidle int intel_idle_irq(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 				    struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	raw_local_irq_enable();
-	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
-	raw_local_irq_disable();
-
-	return ret;
+	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, false);
 }
 
 static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
@@ -184,7 +179,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 	if (smt_active)
 		__update_spec_ctrl(0);
 
-	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
 
 	if (smt_active)
 		__update_spec_ctrl(spec_ctrl);
@@ -196,7 +191,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_xstate(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 				       struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
 {
 	fpu_idle_fpregs();
-	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
+	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.42.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24 22:32 [PATCH 0/7] cpuidle: Handle TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of polling idle states Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86: Add a comment about the "magic" behind shadow sti before mwait Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpuidle: Remove unnecessary current_clr_polling_and_test() from haltpoll Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpuidle: s/CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING/CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_SOFT Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-12 13:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-08 16:37     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpuidle: Introduce CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_HARD Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-12 13:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-08 16:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] cpuidle: Handle TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_HARD states Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-12 13:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-08 17:03     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-24 22:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] cpuidle: Handle TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of software polling idle states Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-12 13:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231124223226.24249-2-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).