Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	nm@ti.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] PM: EM: Refactor em_adjust_new_capacity()
Date: Tue,  2 Apr 2024 16:58:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402155822.505491-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402155822.505491-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Extract em_table_dup() and em_recalc_and_update() from
em_adjust_new_capacity(). Both functions will be later reused by the
'update EM due to chip binning' functionality.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 9e1c9aa399ea9..6960dd7393b2d 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -674,23 +674,15 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_unregister_perf_domain);
 
-/*
- * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
- * are correctly calculated.
- */
-static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
-				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
-				   u64 max_cap)
+static struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table_dup(struct em_perf_domain *pd)
 {
 	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
 	struct em_perf_state *ps, *new_ps;
-	int ret, ps_size;
+	int ps_size;
 
 	em_table = em_table_alloc(pd);
-	if (!em_table) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (!em_table)
+		return NULL;
 
 	new_ps = em_table->state;
 
@@ -702,24 +694,52 @@ static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	em_init_performance(dev, pd, new_ps, pd->nr_perf_states);
-	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, new_ps, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
+	return em_table;
+}
+
+static int em_recalc_and_update(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, em_table->state, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
 			       pd->flags);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: compute costs failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	ret = em_dev_update_perf_domain(dev, em_table);
 	if (ret)
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: update failed %d\n", ret);
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	/*
 	 * This is one-time-update, so give up the ownership in this updater.
 	 * The EM framework has incremented the usage counter and from now
 	 * will keep the reference (then free the memory when needed).
 	 */
+free_em_table:
 	em_table_free(em_table);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
+ * are correctly calculated.
+ */
+static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
+				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				   u64 max_cap)
+{
+	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
+
+	em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
+	if (!em_table) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	em_init_performance(dev, pd, em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states);
+
+	em_recalc_and_update(dev, pd, em_table);
 }
 
 static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 15:58 [PATCH v4 0/4] Update Energy Model after chip binning adjusted voltages Lukasz Luba
2024-04-02 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] OPP: OF: Export dev_opp_pm_calc_power() for usage from EM Lukasz Luba
2024-04-03 12:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-04-02 15:58 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2024-04-02 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PM: EM: Add em_dev_update_chip_binning() Lukasz Luba
2024-04-02 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] soc: samsung: exynos-asv: Update Energy Model after adjusting voltage Lukasz Luba
2024-04-03 12:07   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-04-03 12:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Update Energy Model after chip binning adjusted voltages Dietmar Eggemann
2024-04-03 12:36   ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240402155822.505491-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox