From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EDAC5029B for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712913293; cv=none; b=kKvmCw9zWBjSY4jucaBpbRTr8PF8db/p0JjmGFY/2fgqKwEiAjU+BHEKizgBHfmdErlBRIFz53kRNYhgI0aOMUzoBuO4dP/bxLae6TSA2i3tZhmZVtrurpIeWny68qMdLfdKi3dMSZuBfhFrlO6cqsUKjcGujT7Bd9T+KY2L/CM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712913293; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hYY8RXIlxqYXGuny94QzgtHsP6gOYBBZQSGN+HHzmzk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=shNMtLLozrptuh43IdeAXvs8vvnP2GT+8XIf6GMnKUqE1b+w6YW4j+942v/DMmOZYkt2LXXPYRO3ATwTnrycMD0n8VMKh4VdxNLk/VxwwT9vreMtLRm7uch21YsxVntfZ5VlqTlH2YV2hI31yETXcNAjNoOiK4ZG7IzjLck2Fbs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=P9oyv30E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="P9oyv30E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52337C113CC; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:14:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1712913292; bh=hYY8RXIlxqYXGuny94QzgtHsP6gOYBBZQSGN+HHzmzk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P9oyv30EEwEkogmoxU/TuGsKhxzvhiuO3bDI976G/vwHZnRDRDO0m2P8cSeIszx9J AL60qSFKulmA1GRCa9WKWOxYhllDjqwWrTiiguretQEBlNol4jSOfBsvfTmpzki6n/ GVj2ISqFDdGH/3UOneFZr10tDcSjP6Y9KE2MOuoE= Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:14:49 +0200 From: Greg KH To: lizhe Cc: "viresh.kumar" , "grygorii.strashko" , "gregory.clement" , "grant.likely" , bsegall , broonie , bristot , brgl , "f.fainelli" , "fancer.lancer" , festevam , Finn Thain , rafael , linux-pm Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exit() callback is optional Message-ID: <2024041238-publisher-provable-7ebe@gregkh> References: <5759bc29.32d04.18ed0ef5037.Coremail.sensor1010@163.com> <20240412062407.ntahibzv6xsbrnxs@vireshk-i7> <1b53a162.32e95.18ed0fdb13e.Coremail.sensor1010@163.com> <20240412063246.tk5z245miakbxws4@vireshk-i7> <2117690204.533771.1712904398042.JavaMail.root@mail-tracker-145-3ep34-c9h23-5f64cf7787-82gdh> <2024041212-bony-emphasize-75dd@gregkh> <663acff5.349d4.18ed18da6ff.Coremail.sensor1010@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <663acff5.349d4.18ed18da6ff.Coremail.sensor1010@163.com> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 05:05:05PM +0800, lizhe wrote: > I found it first and submitted it to the main line first. Please be fair and just. Let him withdraw his patch. lore.kernel.org links for this please?