Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	upstream@lists.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OPP: ti: Use devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:52:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610042250.xccda2pr277v6asf@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606113334.396693-2-primoz.fiser@norik.com>

Hi Primoz,

Thanks for your changes, they look exactly as we discussed earlier, but .. 

On 06-06-24, 13:33, Primoz Fiser wrote:
> Function ti_opp_supply_probe() since commit 6baee034cb55 ("OPP: ti:
> Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config_regulators()") returns wrong values
> when all goes well and hence driver probing eventually fails.
> 
> Switch to using devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators() function that
> correctly handles return values and doesn't require us to handle
> returned tokens.
> 
> Fixes: 6baee034cb55 ("OPP: ti: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config_regulators()")
> Signed-off-by: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
> ---
>  drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> index e3b97cd1fbbf..8a4bcc5fb9dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int ti_opp_supply_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = dev_pm_opp_set_config_regulators(cpu_dev, ti_opp_config_regulators);
> +	ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators(cpu_dev, ti_opp_config_regulators);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		_free_optimized_voltages(dev, &opp_data);

-- I made a mistake.

The driver gets probed with a platform device, while
devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators() works with cpu device. And so the
issue related to module insertion/removal/insertion will still be
there :(.

Did you try that though ?

The only way to get this solved is probably by introducing a remove()
method, which clears the OPP config and stores the token returned by
dev_pm_opp_set_config_regulators().

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06 11:33 [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Introduce devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators Primoz Fiser
2024-06-06 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] OPP: ti: Use devm_pm_opp_set_config_regulators Primoz Fiser
2024-06-10  4:22   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2024-06-10 11:39     ` Primoz Fiser
2024-06-11  5:28       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240610042250.xccda2pr277v6asf@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=primoz.fiser@norik.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=upstream@lists.phytec.de \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox