Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@huawei.com,
	zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_get_on_cpu
Date: Fri,  6 Dec 2024 13:55:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206135600.4083965-4-beata.michalska@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206135600.4083965-1-beata.michalska@arm.com>

With the Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) being already wired up with
sched tick and making use of relevant (core counter and constant
counter) AMU counters, getting the average frequency for a given CPU,
can be achieved by utilizing the frequency scale factor which reflects
an average CPU frequency for the last tick period length.

The solution is partially based on APERF/MPERF implementation of
arch_freq_get_on_cpu.

Suggested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index cb180684d10d..5f5738b174c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -88,18 +89,28 @@ int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
  * initialized.
  */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, arch_max_freq_scale) =  1UL << (2 * SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_const_cycles_prev);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_core_cycles_prev);
 static cpumask_var_t amu_fie_cpus;
 
+struct amu_cntr_sample {
+	u64		arch_const_cycles_prev;
+	u64		arch_core_cycles_prev;
+	unsigned long	last_scale_update;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct amu_cntr_sample, cpu_amu_samples);
+
 void update_freq_counters_refs(void)
 {
-	this_cpu_write(arch_core_cycles_prev, read_corecnt());
-	this_cpu_write(arch_const_cycles_prev, read_constcnt());
+	struct amu_cntr_sample *amu_sample = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_amu_samples);
+
+	amu_sample->arch_core_cycles_prev = read_corecnt();
+	amu_sample->arch_const_cycles_prev = read_constcnt();
 }
 
 static inline bool freq_counters_valid(int cpu)
 {
+	struct amu_cntr_sample *amu_sample = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_amu_samples, cpu);
+
 	if ((cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) || !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_present_mask))
 		return false;
 
@@ -108,8 +119,8 @@ static inline bool freq_counters_valid(int cpu)
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(!per_cpu(arch_const_cycles_prev, cpu) ||
-		     !per_cpu(arch_core_cycles_prev, cpu))) {
+	if (unlikely(!amu_sample->arch_const_cycles_prev ||
+		     !amu_sample->arch_core_cycles_prev)) {
 		pr_debug("CPU%d: cycle counters are not enabled.\n", cpu);
 		return false;
 	}
@@ -152,17 +163,22 @@ void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate)
 
 static void amu_scale_freq_tick(void)
 {
+	struct amu_cntr_sample *amu_sample = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_amu_samples);
 	u64 prev_core_cnt, prev_const_cnt;
 	u64 core_cnt, const_cnt, scale;
 
-	prev_const_cnt = this_cpu_read(arch_const_cycles_prev);
-	prev_core_cnt = this_cpu_read(arch_core_cycles_prev);
+	prev_const_cnt = amu_sample->arch_const_cycles_prev;
+	prev_core_cnt = amu_sample->arch_core_cycles_prev;
 
 	update_freq_counters_refs();
 
-	const_cnt = this_cpu_read(arch_const_cycles_prev);
-	core_cnt = this_cpu_read(arch_core_cycles_prev);
+	const_cnt = amu_sample->arch_const_cycles_prev;
+	core_cnt = amu_sample->arch_core_cycles_prev;
 
+	/*
+	 * This should not happen unless the AMUs have been reset and the
+	 * counter values have not been restored - unlikely
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(core_cnt <= prev_core_cnt ||
 		     const_cnt <= prev_const_cnt))
 		return;
@@ -182,6 +198,8 @@ static void amu_scale_freq_tick(void)
 
 	scale = min_t(unsigned long, scale, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
 	this_cpu_write(arch_freq_scale, (unsigned long)scale);
+
+	amu_sample->last_scale_update = jiffies;
 }
 
 static struct scale_freq_data amu_sfd = {
@@ -189,6 +207,77 @@ static struct scale_freq_data amu_sfd = {
 	.set_freq_scale = amu_scale_freq_tick,
 };
 
+static __always_inline bool amu_fie_cpu_supported(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return cpumask_available(amu_fie_cpus) &&
+		cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, amu_fie_cpus);
+}
+
+#define AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS	20
+
+int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	struct amu_cntr_sample *amu_sample;
+	unsigned int start_cpu = cpu;
+	unsigned long last_update;
+	unsigned int freq = 0;
+	u64 scale;
+
+	if (!amu_fie_cpu_supported(cpu) || !arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+retry:
+	amu_sample = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_amu_samples, cpu);
+
+	last_update = amu_sample->last_scale_update;
+
+	/*
+	 * For those CPUs that are in full dynticks mode, or those that have
+	 * not seen tick for a while, try an alternative source for the counters
+	 * (and thus freq scale), if available, for given policy: this boils
+	 * down to identifying an active cpu within the same freq domain, if any.
+	 */
+	if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
+	    time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
+		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+		int ref_cpu = cpu;
+
+		if (!policy)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (!cpumask_intersects(policy->related_cpus,
+					housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK))) {
+			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
+
+
+		do {
+			ref_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus,
+						    start_cpu, false);
+
+		} while (ref_cpu < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ref_cpu));
+
+		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+
+		if (ref_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+			/* No alternative to pull info from */
+			return -EAGAIN;
+
+		cpu = ref_cpu;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * Reversed computation to the one used to determine
+	 * the arch_freq_scale value
+	 * (see amu_scale_freq_tick for details)
+	 */
+	scale = arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu);
+	freq = scale * arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
+	freq >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	return freq;
+}
+
 static void amu_fie_setup(const struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
 	int cpu;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 13:55 [PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq Beata Michalska
2024-12-06 13:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq sysfs entry Beata Michalska
2024-12-12  6:51   ` Viresh Kumar
2024-12-16 22:15     ` Beata Michalska
2024-12-17  4:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2024-12-17 20:10         ` Beata Michalska
2024-12-18  4:11           ` Viresh Kumar
2024-12-19 11:57             ` Beata Michalska
2024-12-16  5:43   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-12-16  7:11     ` Sumit Gupta
2024-12-16  8:33       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-12-16 22:32         ` Beata Michalska
2024-12-16 22:21     ` Beata Michalska
2024-12-06 13:55 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support Beata Michalska
2024-12-06 13:55 ` Beata Michalska [this message]
2024-12-06 13:56 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Update AMU-based freq scale factor on entering idle Beata Michalska

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241206135600.4083965-4-beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox