From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adam Clark <Adam.Clark@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: Fix max-frequency computation
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:11:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113044107.566-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com> (raw)
commit 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover
boost frequencies") introduces an assumption in
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() that the first entry in the P-state table is
the nominal frequency. This assumption is incorrect. The frequency
corresponding to the P0 P-State need not be the same as the nominal
frequency advertised via CPPC.
Since the driver is using the CPPC.highest_perf and CPPC.nominal_perf
to compute the boost-ratio, it makes sense to use CPPC.nominal_freq to
compute the max-frequency. CPPC.nominal_freq is advertised on
platforms supporting CPPC revisions 3 or higher.
Hence, fallback to using the first entry in the P-State table only on
platforms that do not advertise CPPC.nominal_freq.
Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Tested-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index c9ebacf5c88e..744fcdeab173 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -623,7 +623,14 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
-static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu)
+/*
+ * get_max_boost_ratio: Computes the max_boost_ratio as the ratio
+ * between the highest_perf and the nominal_perf.
+ *
+ * Returns the max_boost_ratio for @cpu. Returns the CPPC nominal
+ * frequency via @nominal_freq if it is non-NULL pointer.
+ */
+static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *nominal_freq)
{
struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps;
u64 highest_perf, nominal_perf;
@@ -652,6 +659,9 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu)
nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
+ if (nominal_freq)
+ *nominal_freq = perf_caps.nominal_freq;
+
if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {
pr_debug("CPU%d: highest or nominal performance missing\n", cpu);
return 0;
@@ -664,8 +674,12 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu)
return div_u64(highest_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, nominal_perf);
}
+
#else
-static inline u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
+static inline u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *nominal_freq)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -677,7 +691,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
unsigned int valid_states = 0;
unsigned int result = 0;
- u64 max_boost_ratio;
+ u64 max_boost_ratio, nominal_freq = 0;
unsigned int i;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int blacklisted;
@@ -827,16 +841,20 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
- max_boost_ratio = get_max_boost_ratio(cpu);
+ max_boost_ratio = get_max_boost_ratio(cpu, &nominal_freq);
if (max_boost_ratio) {
- unsigned int freq = freq_table[0].frequency;
+ unsigned int freq = nominal_freq;
/*
- * Because the loop above sorts the freq_table entries in the
- * descending order, freq is the maximum frequency in the table.
- * Assume that it corresponds to the CPPC nominal frequency and
- * use it to set cpuinfo.max_freq.
+ * The loop above sorts the freq_table entries in the
+ * descending order. If ACPI CPPC has not advertised
+ * the nominal frequency (this is possible in CPPC
+ * revisions prior to 3), then use the first entry in
+ * the pstate table as a proxy for nominal frequency.
*/
+ if (!freq)
+ freq = freq_table[0].frequency;
+
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = freq * max_boost_ratio >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
} else {
/*
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 4:41 Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2025-01-13 14:22 ` [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: Fix max-frequency computation Mario Limonciello
2025-01-14 20:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-28 3:24 ` Manu Bretelle
2025-05-28 11:57 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-05-28 16:39 ` Manu Bretelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250113044107.566-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=Adam.Clark@amd.com \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox