From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
lihuisong@huawei.com, fanghao11@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Introduce a more generic way to set default per-policy boost flag
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:31:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250120090102.erm2ffkbnwa5vraa@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117101457.1530653-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
On 17-01-25, 18:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> In cpufreq_online() of cpufreq.c, the per-policy boost flag is already set
> to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init but using freq_table to
> judge if the policy has boost frequency. There are two drawbacks to this
> approach:
>
> 1. It doesn't work for the cpufreq drivers that do not use a frequency
> table. For now, acpi-cpufreq and amd-pstate have to enable boost in policy
> initialization. And cppc_cpufreq never set policy to boost when going
> online no matter what the cpufreq_driver boost flag is.
>
> 2. If the cpu goes offline when cpufreq_driver boost enabled and then goes
> online when cpufreq_driver boost disabled, the per-policy boost flag will
> unreasonably remain true.
>
> Running set_boost at the end of the online process is a more generic way
> for all cpufreq drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 5882d7f5e3c1..5a3566c2eb8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1409,10 +1409,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> goto out_free_policy;
> }
>
> - /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> - if (cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy))
> - policy->boost_enabled = true;
> -
> /*
> * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online.
> * If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it
> @@ -1573,6 +1569,18 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> if (new_policy && cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
> policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
>
> + /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> + if (policy->boost_enabled != cpufreq_boost_enabled()) {
> + policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled();
> + ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, policy->boost_enabled);
I though you agreed to do some optimization here ?
> + if (ret) {
> + /* If the set_boost fails, the online operation is not affected */
> + pr_info("%s: CPU%d: Cannot %s BOOST\n", __func__, policy->cpu,
> + policy->boost_enabled ? "enable" : "disable");
> + policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
> + }
> + }
> +
> pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.33.0
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 10:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq: Fix some boost errors related to CPU online and offline Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-17 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq: Fix re-boost issue after hotplugging a cpu Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-20 8:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-20 9:10 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-20 9:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-20 9:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-17 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Introduce a more generic way to set default per-policy boost flag Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-20 9:01 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2025-01-21 1:45 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-21 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 6:22 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-01-21 6:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-04 16:41 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-02-05 5:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-05 18:22 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-01-17 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong max_freq in policy initialization Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-20 9:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-17 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: ACPI: Remove set_boost in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-21 6:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-24 8:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-24 9:11 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-04-15 10:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 6:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq: Fix some boost errors related to CPU online and offline Viresh Kumar
2025-01-23 20:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250120090102.erm2ffkbnwa5vraa@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox