From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
AND 64-BIT)),
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING
FRAMEWORK), Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:52:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250215005244.1212285-7-superm1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215005244.1212285-1-superm1@kernel.org>
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Using a scoped cleanup macro simplifies cleanup code.
Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index ba3e06f349c6d..9f790c7254d52 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h>
@@ -127,11 +128,12 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
u32 highest_perf = 0, nominal_perf = 0, lowest_nonlinear_perf = 0, lowest_perf = 0;
u64 cap1 = 0;
struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
union perf_cached cur_perf;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
+
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy)
break;
@@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
if (ret) {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s cppc_get_perf_caps ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf;
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
if (ret) {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s read CPPC_CAP1 ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
@@ -167,7 +169,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
if (highest_perf != cur_perf.highest_perf && !cpudata->hw_prefcore) {
pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d highest perf doesn't match\n",
__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->perf.highest_perf);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
if (nominal_perf != cur_perf.nominal_perf ||
(lowest_nonlinear_perf != cur_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf) ||
@@ -177,7 +179,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
__func__, cpu, nominal_perf, cpudata->perf.nominal_perf,
lowest_nonlinear_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf,
lowest_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_perf);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
if (!((highest_perf >= nominal_perf) &&
@@ -188,15 +190,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > lowest=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
__func__, cpu, highest_perf, nominal_perf,
lowest_nonlinear_perf, lowest_perf);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
- return;
-skip_test:
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
/*
@@ -207,10 +205,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
{
int cpu = 0;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
+
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy)
break;
@@ -224,14 +223,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
__func__, cpu, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
if (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq != policy->min) {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s cpu%d cpudata_lowest_nonlinear_freq=%d policy_min=%d, they should be equal!\n",
__func__, cpu, cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, policy->min);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
@@ -243,20 +242,16 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
__func__, cpu, policy->max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
cpudata->nominal_freq);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
} else {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s cpu%d must support boost!\n", __func__, cpu);
- goto skip_test;
+ return;
}
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
- return;
-skip_test:
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
static int amd_pstate_set_mode(enum amd_pstate_mode mode)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-15 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 0:52 [PATCH v2 00/17] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 5:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 6:38 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 21:06 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:01 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-02-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Allow lowest nonlinear and lowest to be the same Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 10:14 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Drop SUCCESS and FAIL enums Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:34 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:38 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Adjust variable scope for amd_pstate_ut_check_freq() Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:39 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:54 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:14 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:30 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:31 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250215005244.1212285-7-superm1@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).