public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@nvidia.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown'
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:46:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219184646.GA226882@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241208074147.22945-1-kaihengf@nvidia.com>

[+to Rafael, +cc linux-pm]

On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 03:41:47PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
> connected.
> 
> The following error message can be found during shutdown:
> pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:09:04.0
> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> pcieport 0000:09:04.0:   device [8086:0b26] error status/mask=00000080/00002000
> pcieport 0000:09:04.0:    [ 7] BadDLLP
> 
> Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
> however the spurious wakeup still happens.

aer_remove() disables AER interrupts, so I guess there must be a
non-AER interrupt being generated during shutdown?

If so, AER is a red herring and including the AER details above is a
distraction from whatever the real interrupt cause is.

> The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
> putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
> 
> ACPI Spec 6.5, "7.4.2.5 System \_S4 State" says "Devices states are
> compatible with the current Power Resource states. In other words, all
> devices are in the D3 state when the system state is S4."
> 
> The following "7.4.2.6 System \_S5 State (Soft Off)" states "The S5
> state is similar to the S4 state except that OSPM does not save any
> context." so it's safe to assume devices should be at D3 for S5.
> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
> Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 35270172c833..248e0c9fd161 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  	if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>  		drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
> +	 * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used. Hence keep it
> +	 * as is.
> +	 */
> +	if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
> +		pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);


I don't know enough to draw inferences about PCI_D0 meaning a wakeup
setting is in place or a workaround being used.  That doesn't seem
like enough to be useful for me to maintain this in the future.  But
my power management understanding is pretty meager.

Would like an ack from Rafael for this.

>  	/*
>  	 * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
>  	 * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
> -- 
> 2.47.0
> 

       reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241208074147.22945-1-kaihengf@nvidia.com>
2025-02-19 18:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-04-22 15:18   ` [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown' Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250219184646.GA226882@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox