From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_online()
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:08:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250401083854.6cp2efo7wxvxjcdd@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3354747.aeNJFYEL58@rjwysocki.net>
On 28-03-25, 21:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> +out_unlock:
> up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> + return ret;
> +
> +out_destroy_policy:
> + for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus)
> + remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j, get_cpu_device(j));
> +
> +out_offline_policy:
> + if (cpufreq_driver->offline)
> + cpufreq_driver->offline(policy);
> +
> +out_exit_policy:
> + if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
> + cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
> +
> +out_clear_policy:
> + cpumask_clear(policy->cpus);
> +
> + goto out_unlock;
Instead of jumping back to the function, won't declaring the label here and
jumping from the earlier code to the end of function more readable ?
goto out_unlock;
out_destroy_policy:
for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus)
remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j, get_cpu_device(j));
out_offline_policy:
if (cpufreq_driver->offline)
cpufreq_driver->offline(policy);
out_exit_policy:
if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
out_clear_policy:
cpumask_clear(policy->cpus);
out_unlock:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
Either ways:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-01 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 20:36 [PATCH v1 00/10] cpufreq: cpufreq_update_limits() fix and some cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-29 2:02 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-29 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-01 16:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-15 13:08 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-04-15 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:40 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] cpufreq: Consolidate some code in cpufreq_online() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:41 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_online() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:38 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2025-04-01 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq policy locking guards Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:43 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange max frequency updates handling code Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-07 18:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:44 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] cpufreq: Use locking guard and __free() in cpufreq_update_policy() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] cpufreq: Drop cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:46 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] cpufreq: Use __free() for policy reference counting cleanup Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:47 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_policy_refresh() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:48 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] cpufreq: Pass policy pointer to ->update_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-07 18:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-07 22:27 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-07 23:49 ` Doug Smythies
2025-04-08 14:18 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-08 11:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 17:47 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-08 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 18:48 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cpufreq: cpufreq_update_limits() fix and some cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-04-09 19:16 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250401083854.6cp2efo7wxvxjcdd@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox