Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: sysfs: Move debug runtime PM attributes to runtime_attrs[]
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 15:50:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507-obedient-imposing-carp-3c9ffa@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12677254.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net>

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 04:29:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Some of the debug sysfs attributes for runtime PM are located
> in the power_attrs[] table, so they are exposed even in the
> pm_runtime_has_no_callbacks() case, unlike the other non-debug
> sysfs attributes for runtime PM, which may be confusing.
> 
> Moreover, dev_attr_runtime_status.attr appears in two
> places, which effectively causes it to be always exposed if
> CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG is set, but otherwise it is exposed
> only when pm_runtime_has_no_callbacks() returns 'false'.
> 
> Address this by putting all sysfs attributes for runtime PM into
> runtime_attrs[].
> 

For once I thought it will change the paths before looking at the code
and realising that all the attributes get merged under "../power/".

FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 14:29 [PATCH v1] PM: sysfs: Move debug runtime PM attributes to runtime_attrs[] Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-05-07 14:50 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-05-07 15:38 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250507-obedient-imposing-carp-3c9ffa@sudeepholla \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox