From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from forward502a.mail.yandex.net (forward502a.mail.yandex.net [178.154.239.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCEB255E69; Sat, 28 Jun 2025 13:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.154.239.82 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751118173; cv=none; b=Insxp2Z+siqFCr7iODyEmwCd0dJG7knjMjKmb8imsSwVHaZ41tXNWE3nn2wMaEkUmtXGQm5BbEucLPwWdVTlhibHRgX49Hy0m+PTahvrqxDh8hWxSiROgSN6Dg0vSWYDO+gcFecr2dEWZc1GDuFM5UYV6trgmjEfyDyutjQWcBc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751118173; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VAee6+av5JH/i3C6FNByMYKYP7UNkqbQVjdUMroatfU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MfvCMULerd+9OW/amKOJD0ItFsUdQ2b6vKnjVev9+s18oV9u+Kq87z/P+MxJc7azVf4yodrPmUiknR5rhZCLdoleStBia0RIsUBWons6ni9JtztHl8ycOtiEETFZaLr2kOKPyeSa0XIa5qas4MyXK5O8GrXS1zVsB4xWIcCB0m8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b=ZXWIbWvL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.154.239.82 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b="ZXWIbWvL" Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-92.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-92.vla.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c15:2ea0:0:640:5268:0]) by forward502a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPS id 6CE0461414; Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:42:42 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-92.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id ZgXqp0LLu0U0-6beYeotD; Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:42:41 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onurozkan.dev; s=mail; t=1751118161; bh=VAee6+av5JH/i3C6FNByMYKYP7UNkqbQVjdUMroatfU=; h=Cc:Message-ID:Subject:Date:References:To:From:In-Reply-To; b=ZXWIbWvLFBkekQbsXfRUhZj3n8Cyds4+TE0bo9VWS7xaQr4qys+rL3XXS12oHbrjD EL9Fqk9MBTV1RGMStTCZOwvgT1reA7xz6iGtRX3868GtXWgNsFSYHa6TCzL3SkOwxf aS8phWfzvWrm8WzO2c4WWedFmCW1iX6bV80yqYZA= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-92.vla.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@onurozkan.dev Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:42:35 +0300 From: Onur To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org, a.hindborg@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu, rafael@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, davidgow@google.com, nm@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: remove `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]` Message-ID: <20250628164235.1376ab5f@nimda.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20250628040956.2181-1-work@onurozkan.dev> <20250628040956.2181-4-work@onurozkan.dev> <20250628133013.703461c8@nimda.home> <20250628154237.0f367cee@nimda.home> <20250628161117.7786b3a4@nimda.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 15:28:29 +0200 Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 3:11=E2=80=AFPM Onur wrote: > > > > Aha, I see. I missed that. I guess `allow` was added when the author > > had this lint enabled on their checkout, but their work was merged > > when lint removal was merged before that. >=20 > Yeah, some of the code going around was written years ago, so > sometimes this sort of thing happens. :) >=20 > > Do you want me to update the patch description by including > > 5e7c9b84ad08 ref and send v4? >=20 > Sure -- maybe wait a few days, to see if anyone says anything else. > Then we will need to wait for Acked-bys from other maintainers. >=20 > Or, actually, if you are sending a new version and you are willing to > do it, then it would be easier to land if you split the first patch > also by subsystem -- that way each maintainer can take their patches > on their own time instead. Since each patch is independent, you can > send them in independent patch series, that makes it even easier for > maintainers to track. I don't have enough time to do it right now, but I would be happy to do it in ~3 days during the week (assuming it's still not being reviewed by the maintainers by then). Regards, Onur