From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A592125B2; Sun, 7 Sep 2025 06:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757225787; cv=none; b=hcfdTawF6wXXn9RbhPO9hGljIOunEAhRGT+7+zwSyJFfpTFh3WIlZpFluG5fPt3/0bbqwE67MDdIvpdjFOERvjc+TvZbI8OA4Xn80sZdPFUM7l5bPnVdWV/8Lr5yJYEJNxOGeebxXnP5zMpnfV6hKsMhOdhNClpYhL8uIfEH3+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757225787; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lGPCrWhKZU8OPA9OuXU2JI0gKkzLniADujgwev5bEBs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ipjtKq9KpUTfVph1atkejtHpFtt7jpPrvqFKqsJDd19fcE66cbKbvfgS2lr1rUQ6sWT6wJ5BnEuAz5EBrpZsJtkEtowB+d64WXURDP1Iiyoqq5bOQ1HIoSab/K9+q2DbfoAFtU3S15poR/uh+/QQ0IJaK1RE8Z6baOnuCl0Lico= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fYLFDhV7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fYLFDhV7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757225786; x=1788761786; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lGPCrWhKZU8OPA9OuXU2JI0gKkzLniADujgwev5bEBs=; b=fYLFDhV7+DRQZVbDaBWJ8tuvbhYqGq1BvTBL3MkIEaEF38My33wpQjj8 KIByNw69GbnKji0fxHp6MwbC+sUOxmkpTwOJCETjq9nMgZIK/DDOVguT7 zNOIj29KCFtusGe2OQ0UTu85TrpNyTzLzgArW7oG4kOhNxx5qAqGlRQow XxoTxQB9Ul5sqLN/SDye9gSLUj58qDeEN68aMG8LB3GVkHhEi6wRfEY8b 6DMjSPOR7xWFbWjAo/8rAQrmXORVa+wgLSiwaLXQisjvhRYRzlHV6BCzy HQh3LrSf7PVgcDE69UiK2tB9IDxaeWUVK/VaY0fy7qGomw6fhF7jxZsX2 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iIW0/YTQT9a3zayI9fYRvA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UKbqowbsRUyLEPj2vOFqWQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11545"; a="59589025" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,245,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="59589025" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Sep 2025 23:16:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kSDflqCBRdqAKSF1mZGNPA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yFvq59kSSbS1gBdR2InZLg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,245,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="177706786" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 114d98da2b6c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2025 23:16:20 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 114d98da2b6c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uv8hG-00024F-0K; Sun, 07 Sep 2025 06:16:18 +0000 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 14:15:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Lin Yikai , Christian Loehle , Song Liu , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, zhaofuyu@vivo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] cpuidle: Implement BPF extensible cpuidle governor class Message-ID: <202509071459.Gkqhd7YV-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250901135609.76590-2-yikai.lin@vivo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250901135609.76590-2-yikai.lin@vivo.com> Hi Lin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lin-Yikai/cpuidle-Implement-BPF-extensible-cpuidle-governor-class/20250901-220011 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250901135609.76590-2-yikai.lin%40vivo.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] cpuidle: Implement BPF extensible cpuidle governor class config: arm-randconfig-r131-20250907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250907/202509071459.Gkqhd7YV-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250907/202509071459.Gkqhd7YV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509071459.Gkqhd7YV-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ext.c:141:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'ops_enabled_key' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/ops_enabled_key +141 drivers/cpuidle/governors/ext.c 139 140 static DEFINE_MUTEX(ops_mutex); > 141 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(ops_enabled_key); 142 static atomic_t ops_enable_state_var = ATOMIC_INIT(OPS_DISABLED); 143 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki