From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Ryan Zhou <ryanzhou54@gmail.com>
Cc: "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"royluo@google.com" <royluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drvier: usb: dwc3: Fix runtime PM trying to activate child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 01:32:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250911013242.oxm2kwfaqvmybbhk@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909161901.10733-1-ryanzhou54@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025, Ryan Zhou wrote:
> Issue description:During the wake-up sequence, if the system invokes
> dwc3->resume and detects that the parent device of dwc3 is in a
> runtime suspend state, the system will generate an error: runtime PM
> trying to activate child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active.
>
> Solution:At the dwc3->resume entry point, if the dwc3 controller
> is detected in a suspended state, the function shall return
> immediately without executing any further operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Zhou <ryanzhou54@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index 370fc524a468..06a6f8a67129 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2687,6 +2687,9 @@ int dwc3_pm_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> struct device *dev = dwc->dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> + return ret;
> +
Is this a documented behavior where the device should remain runtime
suspend on system resume? I feel that that this should be configurable
by the user or defined the PM core. I don't think we should change
default behavior here just to workaround the issue that we're facing.
What if the user wants to keep the old behavior and resume up the device
on system resume?
BR,
Thinh
> pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
>
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250826150826.11096-1-ryanzhou54@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CA+zupgwnbt=5Oh28Chco=YNt9WwKzi2J+0hQ04nqyZG_7WUAYg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPwe5RMpdG1ziRAwDhqkxuzHX0x=SdFQRFUbPCVuir1OgE90YQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-27 14:52 ` [PATCH] drvier: usb: dwc3: Fix runtime PM trying to activate child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active Alan Stern
2025-08-27 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-29 0:43 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-08-29 1:25 ` Alan Stern
2025-08-29 19:07 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-08-29 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-29 20:13 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-08-30 0:46 ` Alan Stern
2025-08-30 1:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-08-29 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-29 19:58 ` Alan Stern
2025-09-01 19:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-01 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-02 2:41 ` Alan Stern
2025-09-03 11:51 ` ryan zhou
2025-09-03 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 21:54 ` Alan Stern
2025-09-04 14:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-04 14:19 ` Alan Stern
2025-09-04 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-04 17:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-04 18:54 ` Alan Stern
2025-09-09 16:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Ryan Zhou
2025-09-09 16:25 ` Greg KH
2025-09-10 12:26 ` [PATCH v3] " Ryan Zhou
2025-09-10 12:56 ` [PATCH v2] " ryan zhou
2025-09-10 13:07 ` Greg KH
2025-09-11 13:25 ` ryan zhou
2025-09-11 1:32 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2025-09-11 10:52 ` Xu Yang
2025-09-11 11:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-11 13:56 ` ryan zhou
2025-09-11 13:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-12 7:51 ` Xu Yang
2025-09-12 21:38 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-09-11 13:51 ` ryan zhou
2025-09-12 7:49 ` Xu Yang
2025-09-11 13:40 ` ryan zhou
2025-09-12 21:36 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-09-12 22:23 ` [PATCH] " Thinh Nguyen
2025-09-13 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250911013242.oxm2kwfaqvmybbhk@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=royluo@google.com \
--cc=ryanzhou54@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox