From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable: commit "cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information" causes regressions
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:47:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025101451-unlinked-strongly-2fb3@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36iykr223vmcfsoysexug6s274nq2oimcu55ybn6ww4il3g3cv@cohflgdbpnq7>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:43:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are observing performance regressions (cpu usage, power
> consumption, dropped frames in video playback test, etc.)
> after updating to recent stable kernels. We tracked it down
> to commit 3cd2aa93674e in linux-6.1.y and commit 3cd2aa93674
> in linux-6.6.y ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information",
> upstream commit 85975daeaa4).
>
> Upstream fixup fa3fa55de0d ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid using
> invalid recent intervals data") doesn't address the problems we are
> observing. Revert seems to be bringing performance metrics back to
> pre-regression levels.
>
For some reason that commit was not added to the 6.1 releases, sorry
about that. Can you submit a working/tested backport so we can queue it
up after the next round of releases in a few days?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 7:43 stable: commit "cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information" causes regressions Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 7:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-10-14 7:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 8:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-14 11:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 9:50 ` Christian Loehle
2025-10-14 10:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 10:25 ` Christian Loehle
2025-10-14 11:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 15:11 ` Christian Loehle
2025-10-14 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-14 17:19 ` Christian Loehle
2025-10-14 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-14 17:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-15 1:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-15 3:41 ` Doug Smythies
2025-10-15 4:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-15 14:11 ` Doug Smythies
2025-10-16 4:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-16 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-16 10:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-16 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-15 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-15 14:32 ` Doug Smythies
2025-10-16 9:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-15 12:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-16 4:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-15 1:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 13:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-14 13:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-14 13:58 ` Christian Loehle
2025-10-14 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-15 1:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-15 13:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-16 4:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-10-16 9:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025101451-unlinked-strongly-2fb3@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox