public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<pierre.gondois@arm.com>, <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
	<ionela.voinescu@arm.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
	<robert.moore@intel.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	<gautham.shenoy@amd.com>, <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	<perry.yuan@amd.com>, <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
	<yumpusamongus@gmail.com>, <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <treding@nvidia.com>,
	<jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
	<ksitaraman@nvidia.com>, <sanjayc@nvidia.com>,
	<nhartman@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>, <bbasu@nvidia.com>,
	<sumitg@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 5/7] cpufreq: cppc: Update MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF in target callbacks
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 19:56:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260206142658.72583-6-sumitg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260206142658.72583-1-sumitg@nvidia.com>

Update MIN_PERF and MAX_PERF registers from policy->min and policy->max
in the .target() and .fast_switch() callbacks. This allows controlling
performance bounds via standard scaling_min_freq and scaling_max_freq
sysfs interfaces.

Similar to intel_cpufreq which updates HWP min/max limits in .target(),
cppc_cpufreq now programs MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF along with DESIRED_PERF.
Since MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF can be updated even when auto_sel is disabled,
they are updated unconditionally.

Also program MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF in store_auto_select() when enabling
autonomous selection so the platform uses correct bounds immediately.

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index e394cdac7f87..b277530ac420 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -287,6 +287,21 @@ static inline void cppc_freq_invariance_exit(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE */
 
+static void cppc_cpufreq_update_perf_limits(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
+					    struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;
+	u32 min_perf, max_perf;
+
+	min_perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(caps, policy->min);
+	max_perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(caps, policy->max);
+
+	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.min_perf =
+		clamp_t(u32, min_perf, caps->lowest_perf, caps->highest_perf);
+	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.max_perf =
+		clamp_t(u32, max_perf, caps->lowest_perf, caps->highest_perf);
+}
+
 static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				   unsigned int target_freq,
 				   unsigned int relation)
@@ -298,6 +313,8 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf =
 			cppc_khz_to_perf(&cpu_data->perf_caps, target_freq);
+	cppc_cpufreq_update_perf_limits(cpu_data, policy);
+
 	freqs.old = policy->cur;
 	freqs.new = target_freq;
 
@@ -322,8 +339,9 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	desired_perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(&cpu_data->perf_caps, target_freq);
 	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = desired_perf;
-	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
+	cppc_cpufreq_update_perf_limits(cpu_data, policy);
 
+	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_debug("Failed to set target on CPU:%d. ret:%d\n",
 			 cpu, ret);
@@ -869,6 +887,27 @@ static ssize_t store_auto_select(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel = val;
 
+	if (val) {
+		u32 old_min_perf = cpu_data->perf_ctrls.min_perf;
+		u32 old_max_perf = cpu_data->perf_ctrls.max_perf;
+
+		/*
+		 * When enabling autonomous selection, program MIN_PERF and
+		 * MAX_PERF from current policy limits so that the platform
+		 * uses the correct performance bounds immediately.
+		 */
+		cppc_cpufreq_update_perf_limits(cpu_data, policy);
+
+		ret = cppc_set_perf(policy->cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
+		if (ret) {
+			cpu_data->perf_ctrls.min_perf = old_min_perf;
+			cpu_data->perf_ctrls.max_perf = old_max_perf;
+			cppc_set_auto_sel(policy->cpu, false);
+			cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel = false;
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return count;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-06 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-06 14:26 [PATCH v8 0/7] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] ACPI: CPPC: Warn on missing mandatory DESIRED_PERF register Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] ACPI: CPPC: Extend cppc_set_epp_perf() for FFH/SystemMemory Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] cpufreq: CPPC: Update cached perf_ctrls on sysfs write Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` Sumit Gupta [this message]
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2026-02-06 14:26 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs documentation " Sumit Gupta
2026-02-26 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2026-02-27 20:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-03 17:32     ` Sumit Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260206142658.72583-6-sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yumpusamongus@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox