From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3153C196A for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774942971; cv=none; b=Veoxg3S5hK3ZCX2e8xMeqEsQVVNesUKBC0QRZEY5KjZVpn1BmLGUJfzxIPoLeS++uIP/fUXWaQ2ZG1bw2fCUOGuLLOPC3sr7R2wmLsaSLyo+VbSFFc8+13CjIpe3vj0+t6FxJi36KxkZyaYxhAjHtPnvQA/grfegonTUSiH/A/E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774942971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L7XPc/53vFUrQZfCcRv3H0GUT/8Py/FOdZhH9DFNfQA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=PXbEbyobtKFrRR6xf7LdFe3YXBW7cU3MnjS5903dsVgd9amA6i/OlRr/ctHh+hI/eGwdjJbaq6SEOim/VSD3kR4ku+G5u4H8VefUG0EdnEyuel+x1DUDQFsxekIOG9NioBcIP7gtCvJalC9jNdagDHARZvJuGQpWIuP8Q4hTavE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Iy+xLJZj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Iy+xLJZj" Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43b8e8e7432so4399268f8f.1 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:42:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1774942968; x=1775547768; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5iOl0Mz285FYoSJuYMKywDcqLaVhSu1lB84eMWBiZpQ=; b=Iy+xLJZjXIpcDg5wcfY3TaFpZkRr2CEwpFJUZksBmJ5rme0VXbgF2ocEJM9cdpatkY B6kPVArajHiXRK1LB+fW91rFEicNY2AFPbZzlE6C2Kj0QyFa8dh3wYwXwl1tjFkWUJZ8 bfkBs0xqU5p+7IQybih9NPCGQuJ/xU11VqvBcZHnx155WyMlB6EfaqIFhmMtYDULBuH3 7AKOgyMB/3UFqKQvus7EN7E6fFJC6qRe/bKcD08pn2JA3WbJeZO5pFoAYWiP2LqVrdGy fwJ8kCLKYLROMwE7TQ6pyvjJwgJWzUd5mSEcn3FxRhI9iyXRjZpCVZv5Gr61woftaLMR 9nTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1774942968; x=1775547768; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:sender:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5iOl0Mz285FYoSJuYMKywDcqLaVhSu1lB84eMWBiZpQ=; b=M9S/KTZhA6yIzp6uXYapmSPpjiMlJzSuD+CEs7fOqLau7m8zWXdbeK3Ct2ckq//3Gm XtIKafmTZRPgf1Rt2O7d04tqATL52DyNuC25Rir6WRHf1eczuG1bw3zeR8UBXDGAYzJl QQZfo2axTug0ZNRaMBG8GTlT/YKMNx6w9FI5TGOXgOdd/B8bygXNJflpnwPQ27CbUV/P kq4KI2xqPzFARfGP/UmAu4yQnGOAXeXTz3f84qn/X/eLILQf8c9273uilkMX+ey8h3QC uBz3FPPg0NS9RRUphJsojmX+DLWCPNysnBJdinV3IIcqOyxuTGLISBwLdHoN3qBZVWBU oh6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4NdYMPyUzEAejvvcRvyaMCFfTP2bgkjH5cYLO97ehfbl158cH DXsmhFCUHmI5ebPRJ0K6pkn/Q+opLeR+nDdaVIwKAPtD2iUVmgElx2zm X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzw33YBHLVunlwgZ8KnWi3YHLwvDd9chS9YuM8GVco/i8bGiC25ZJz9RPQ2kdlz Rk6WFeZx3U48C/vvB+ALsT0bD3N9wWaJ21dhMk2qOj0+2JbqJ+NqTye+3drh5ZEHzf1xyDvO76F 44Qho7/SwfzFib+b5yywYM1kDGUybqE+o4L2gTifsCy74j2lp0JGLFD801v40R7r+ZW7abOhiXz xj29968JI3/2e1SDaL4//f3oZBCONNtTNlrhfwK9RR8qfuPGLYsSWV3gi34aGs1ybVLztJK7Dd+ 2sVKGdUY1Vq6lNzi70JVB3waPHUgezydxosWKXV8uPk2qnN7YLIfF8vqBxt9773dxccXaJVbKmS XuBuM+yWpzezBi6EhPiyi4uXXdPlBgKh2PwYYq7itmJu3px2+4N141WxfiYqngOReT5k/3gz7P5 Wn9Js4wKhQbZ1zO+yh/0pSjpN6DsjYiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5d0f:0:b0:439:bd70:6114 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43b9ea0885bmr26201095f8f.38.1774942968402; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nixos-office ([2001:8a0:e95c:5e00:f8c1:fa51:743d:7994]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43cf21e29b1sm23499630f8f.8.2026.03.31.00.42.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julian Braha From: Julian Braha To: rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julian Braha Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: cleanup dead code in Kconfig Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:42:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20260331074242.39986-1-julianbraha@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit There is already an 'if CPU_FREQ' condition wrapping these config options, making the 'depends on' statement for each a duplicate dependency (dead code). I propose leaving the outer 'if CPU_FREQ...endif' and removing the individual 'depends on' statement from each option. This dead code was found by kconfirm, a static analysis tool for Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Julian Braha --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig index 78702a08364f..db83f3365698 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE tristate "'conservative' cpufreq governor" - depends on CPU_FREQ select CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON help 'conservative' - this driver is rather similar to the 'ondemand' @@ -188,7 +187,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL bool "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor" - depends on CPU_FREQ && SMP + depends on SMP select CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET select IRQ_WORK help @@ -365,6 +364,6 @@ config ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE If in doubt, say N. -endif +endif # CPU_FREQ endmenu -- 2.51.2