From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] thermal: core: Add WQ_UNBOUND to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 16:25:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514142511.325446-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.
This workqueue has no benefits being per-CPU, so make it unbound using
explicitly WQ_UNBOUND.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- "thermal_events" workqueue has more benefits being unbound, so instead
of WQ_PERCPU, use WQ_UNBOUND.
Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260514132901.275477-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com/
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
index 2f4e2dc46b8f..1ac4262dafbc 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -1889,7 +1889,8 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
if (result)
goto error;
- thermal_wq = alloc_workqueue("thermal_events", WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT, 0);
+ thermal_wq = alloc_workqueue("thermal_events",
+ WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
if (!thermal_wq) {
result = -ENOMEM;
goto unregister_netlink;
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514142511.325446-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox