From: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: twl4030_charger: worker not cancelled on remove?
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 01:21:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702172128.2001753-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Sebastian,
twl4030_charger looks like it has the worker race on remove that bq25890
fixed (commit 7e6fb67808ab). I would appreciate it if you could take a look.
The driver data is allocated with devm in probe:
bci = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bci), GFP_KERNEL);
It has two workers that both dereference bci:
INIT_WORK(&bci->work, twl4030_bci_usb_work);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bci->current_worker, twl4030_current_worker);
twl4030_bci_remove() disables charging and masks interrupts. It cancels
neither worker. A worker still pending at remove runs after devm frees bci,
so it touches freed memory.
bq25890 fixed the same shape by unregistering the USB notifier, then
cancel_work_sync() on remove. twl4030 is different. Its notifier comes from
devm_usb_get_phy_by_node(), so devm unregisters it after remove() returns.
A plain cancel in remove() could then still race a reschedule. So a single
cancel in remove() is not enough.
current_worker does not depend on the notifier. It reschedules itself, so it
needs cancel_delayed_work_sync regardless.
Does this look like a real bug? If it does, I am happy to send a patch. I am
not sure of the best shape here. One option is to move the phy off devm and
mirror bq25890. Another is to coordinate the cancel differently. What would
you prefer?
I do not have the hardware. The use-after-free is from a KASAN harness. It
runs the worker after the bci free.
Thanks,
Maoyi
reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702172128.2001753-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--to=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox