From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17BA3422552; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783949034; cv=none; b=CFW3+3+QdD3qw8KsVQ0d2HHtgQSiqQ/0bswrLEpYXTvJuWEOBhOZaO2dY0CAl7nSl6sPr2wiuXR9KE0V1+cypqVGtGsSY2o6J+yEMxxBN/6RFhJZgNiZSU3T9Kz14N66V9QZZ2LnEg1vf9EYrzNLCcGGdBmQvjOQPtnX+YWN+lc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783949034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=056eOz/k5VBRiA76rXy9WLW+TRu86FA9xsYttVqFx9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cu/BLxcBleqcsjwaX99GEwCRZvovxHrvOU0EhnDxPl4PEvD7ZTyQ29EE4lJpqZoLYVUK5NoCs5kTWjROGoiI+0vqPHrBLjV6HfTXqOJJKMnQ+9CuRrmzdnp7w9OjcBzJdt9nokRQdQaBzxZPhaq7r9olOkIZtjbAR9kxPs4yeXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K6jaqcbz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K6jaqcbz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 007901F000E9; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:23:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783949032; bh=ZSMEE1nB2ScVoEokNvwIEkHnNb+xGxBB5l9/2VUhvyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=K6jaqcbzmYReHSbxJqLXA5fxL4ypD57TpHDnTqYQzYutL0XLQgI+kuOtII+6ZxMzy 1fcTOyskJI0D40mm2Ks0+58fmqaC49WKxHsgoQ9DSc4CBUfymkNDB/d5FTZfnc3Tc5 bhNSog2HqziC7cRlYhmvQ3p7sgiHtx8JRQEp4ifJz46TA5M7Yb/OegLFTx1r9Tmhed 742othwIeVao7tl2pg4EtiHJ5zY0l3ujRxXII6MERy54Cje7nkGYeLqR0sygITu1un uBQNIRGPB5w5ZRmGgxY2z7VjykasLMEbzAoV0qL6sD16xIHWPi5U/Bk3/BMJaH0shw gLuEz9TGxoA1Q== Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:23:49 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , Sudeep Holla , Linux ACPI Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Message-ID: <20260713-adept-quiet-giraffe-ca9af4@sudeepholla> References: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki> <1964818.CQOukoFCf9@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1964818.CQOukoFCf9@rafael.j.wysocki> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > > To reduce code duplication, introduce a function called too_many_states() > that will check if the total number of _LPI states for a given CPU is > too large and print a message in that case. > > Use that function in flatten_lpi_states() and acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(). > > No functional impact beyond reducing dynamic debug flexibility. > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep