From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931EB421A12; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783948652; cv=none; b=tiuHVpIvhwWTjwcDz5pvh8E9d6tU61yzIWVu9fMQRvrOewaeSbSQzddx6YqdC9w8Ja0lbK67IShqXCXRYHk7iZDRwUj7zyiSCrJXgdD2Wyfb05CgNWJLnPKMb3Xi8PFKnTceEyixprIdnzJQuRBiMtuoa5y40t5LR5yWtfhrS9g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783948652; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JC/lJ/HQkfsfbILDjKPqLOhuX83T5J4LJVMmn5qmLxs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nKl14u5Mcht4YSsFKi/RDp8BfoZ8XYHcFsHZCAPP/he0aEsjA8J3iz/owfXTGGq4Y4wo9ndrvljuSUii59TpH+oeRbhaz7hIr0oogNpfMRwxc4FO1GeL38uY4YqvBElqC7oX5VLkZsee8hpW+bIOpTurR29a7f8SENaGvvYBL2M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KC6Q+GXh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KC6Q+GXh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C30D1F000E9; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:17:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783948651; bh=CTDzIuECg7ec2CujzD4dfEzEhYJme9GipSqlqXXMpj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=KC6Q+GXhttKsbu9CWEw31Iy/WZwxMdPA/KSPis3lfiKK/wLCqQbVrZvDCW9ARu5Gl QabXyKFrVUYprBT5dwjhN8f5YfSIW7/bmZwo8EHj5wWB8lU86Pj3y8+Ko0QLSVSQZz ZbZPb9nSrvcaZI30VFQ6H8UX5vAEG3in4ywlOyxpPuSXzkVwxnA3GOCW0dosrzHanm 96Dk3ofjo/sBxx5S402dwbfF/WyPxf7s4n7ni5hXzI4GHp8FqNr7HzHVZ5kEkuirLg SJI/K/h3IzGl8AaCcLdgo9FdkjtIg5xwfGI19pq2gKkKmgS4KmYW0fyxG8t+/mW+// IOtz88h0vnPqg== Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:17:28 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , Sudeep Holla , Linux ACPI Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Message-ID: <20260713-debonair-imposing-stingray-1aa12b@sudeepholla> References: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki> <10878273.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10878273.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > > Move individual _LPI state package processing from > acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() to a separate new function > called process_lpi_state_package(). > > No intentional functional impact. > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep