Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	david.laight.linux@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	joao.m.martins@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ashok.bhat@arm.com,
	Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:30:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714073041.40250-7-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714073041.40250-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Add the acquire variant of smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(). This
reuses the relaxed variant, with additional LOAD->LOAD ordering
via smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep().

To ensure that the necessary control dependency on the dereference
of @ptr exists (which does not in the timeout path), re-evaluate
the cond_expr branch.

Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
 include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index d1e9ed15bbfc..b2b260a41122 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -352,6 +352,46 @@ do {									\
 })
 #endif
 
+/**
+ * smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() - (Spin) wait for cond until a timeout
+ * expires. ACQUIRE ordering when @cond_expr is satisfied.
+ * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on.
+ * @cond_expr: boolean expression to wait for.
+ * @time_expr_ns: monotonic expression that evaluates to time in ns or,
+ *  on failure, returns a negative value.
+ * @timeout_ns: timeout value in ns
+ * (Both of the above are assumed to be compatible with s64.)
+ *
+ * Equivalent to using smp_cond_load_acquire() on the condition variable with
+ * a timeout.
+ */
+#ifndef smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout
+#define smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(ptr, cond_expr,			\
+				      time_expr_ns, timeout_ns)		\
+({									\
+	__unqual_scalar_typeof(*(ptr)) VAL;				\
+	VAL = smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(ptr, cond_expr,		\
+					     time_expr_ns,		\
+					     timeout_ns);		\
+	/*								\
+	 * We arrive here once the loop condition is hit, on timeout,	\
+	 * or, if we hit both the timeout and the loop condition.	\
+	 *								\
+	 * The last case is low probability, but possible in the last	\
+	 * iteration, especially on architectures with waiting		\
+	 * cpu_poll_relax() implementations (ex. arm64).		\
+	 * Now since the loop condition is not evaluated on timeout,	\
+	 * we have a missed control dependency.				\
+	 *								\
+	 * So, force a re-evaluation of the control dependency to	\
+	 * provide an ACQUIRE ordering for that case as well.		\
+	 */								\
+	if (cond_expr)							\
+		smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();				\
+	(typeof(*(ptr)))VAL;						\
+})
+#endif
+
 /*
  * pmem_wmb() ensures that all stores for which the modification
  * are written to persistent storage by preceding instructions have
-- 
2.43.7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14  7:30 [PATCH v14 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-16  7:01 ` [PATCH v14 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260714073041.40250-7-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox