Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	david.laight.linux@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	joao.m.martins@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ashok.bhat@arm.com,
	Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 16/16] barrier: timeout validity checks for smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:22:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831202251.305046-17-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831202251.305046-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Extend timeout tests in smp_cond_expiry_params to also test
smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout().

The interface supports clocks that can return error on timeout.
These are used by rqspinlock. Test that by using a similar clock
that starts returning error past timeout.

Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
 lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c b/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
index 9b16ad6f5514..ba5b6820d0b6 100644
--- a/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
+++ b/lib/tests/barrier-timeout-test.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void expiry_param_to_desc(const struct smp_cond_expiry_params *p, char *d
 
 	snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE,
 		 "smp_cond_*_timeout: clock=%s,  timeout=%s, iterations %s",
-		 "synthetic", p->desc, iters);
+		 "synthetic/failing", p->desc, iters);
 }
 
 static void test_smp_cond_relaxed(struct kunit *test)
@@ -194,10 +194,56 @@ static void test_smp_cond_relaxed(struct kunit *test)
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, runtime, p->timeout_ns);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Use a clock similar to the one used in rqspinlock where it start
+ * returning failure value once it goes beyond the timeout.
+ */
+static s64 failing_clock(const struct smp_cond_expiry_params *p,
+			 struct clock_state *clk)
+{
+	clk->end_time += clk->extra;
+	clk->niters++;
+
+	if ((u64)clk->end_time >= (u64)p->timeout_ns)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return clk->end_time;
+}
+
+static void test_smp_cond_acquire_error(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct smp_cond_expiry_params *p = test->param_value;
+	struct clock_state clk = {
+		.start_time = 0,
+		.end_time = 0,
+		.extra = p->clk_unit,
+		.niters = 0,
+	};
+	s64 ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	flag = 0;
+	smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&flag,
+				      0,
+				      (ret = failing_clock(p, &clk)),
+				      p->timeout_ns);
+
+	if (p->miniters != -1)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, clk.niters, p->miniters);
+	if (p->maxiters != -1)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, clk.niters, p->maxiters);
+
+	/*
+	 * flag is never updated so the clock should eventually
+	 * hit the timeout and error out.
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ETIMEDOUT);
+}
+
 KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(smp_cond_expiry_params, expiry_params_list, expiry_param_to_desc);
 static struct kunit_case barrier_timeout_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_smp_cond_timeout, smp_cond_update_params_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_smp_cond_relaxed, smp_cond_expiry_params_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_smp_cond_acquire_error, smp_cond_expiry_params_gen_params),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.43.7


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 20:22 [PATCH v15 00/16] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 01/16] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 02/16] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 03/16] arm64/delay: move, fixup usecs_to_cycles() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 04/16] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 05/16] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 06/16] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 07/16] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 08/16] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 09/16] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 10/16] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:31   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 11/16] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 12/16] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 13/16] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 14/16] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 15/16] barrier: timeout validity checks for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` Ankur Arora [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831202251.305046-17-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox