From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM: runtime: Add kunit test for supplier idle/suspend
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:23:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901013341.1417232-2-briannorris@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901013341.1417232-1-briannorris@chromium.org>
Add a unit test that covers the bugfix/optimization in the previous
patch, "PM: runtime: Only queue an idle check for RPM-linked suppliers".
This test ensures:
1) device links with DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME can RPM-resume/suspend properly;
and
2) device links without DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME are not accidentally
resumed/suspended along with the consumer.
Notably, without patch 1 ("PM: runtime: Only queue an idle check for
RPM-linked suppliers"), the no-RPM supplier will fail 2 of its last 3
test expectations:
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kconfig_add CONFIG_PM=y 'pm_runtime*'
...
## Fails because rpm_suspend_suppliers() suspended the wrong links
[17:01:44] # pm_runtime_supplier_suspend_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c:279
[17:01:44] Expected pm_runtime_active(norpm_supplier) to be true, but is false
## Fails because the no-RPM supplier is already suspended unexpectedly
[17:01:44] # pm_runtime_supplier_suspend_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c:282
[17:01:44] Expected 0 == pm_runtime_suspend(norpm_supplier), but
[17:01:44] pm_runtime_suspend(norpm_supplier) == 1 (0x1)
...
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
In my opinion, this patch is slightly better as a proof for my patch 1
fix, rather than a proper unit test, mainly because it:
1) tests a somewhat arcane set of particular sequences and
2) lightly depends on the behavior of pm_wq.
But it should be a reliable regression test still, if it's deemed
valuable.
drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c
index 1535ad2b0264..24865ce844fc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime-test.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <kunit/device.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
@@ -229,6 +230,61 @@ static void pm_runtime_probe_active_test(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(dev));
}
+static void pm_runtime_supplier_suspend_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device *dev = kunit_device_register(test, DEVICE_NAME);
+ struct device *supplier = kunit_device_register(test, DEVICE_NAME "_supplier");
+ struct device *norpm_supplier = kunit_device_register(test, DEVICE_NAME "_norpm_supplier");
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, supplier);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, norpm_supplier);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, device_link_add(dev, supplier, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, device_link_add(dev, norpm_supplier, 0));
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+ pm_runtime_enable(supplier);
+ pm_runtime_enable(norpm_supplier);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(dev));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(norpm_supplier));
+
+ /*
+ * Resume the device and RPM-linked supplier; non-RPM-linked supplier
+ * stays suspended.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, pm_runtime_get_sync(dev));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_active(dev));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_active(supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(norpm_supplier));
+
+ /* Also resume the non-RPM-linked supplier. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, pm_runtime_get_sync(norpm_supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_active(norpm_supplier));
+
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(norpm_supplier);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_active(norpm_supplier));
+
+ /*
+ * Suspend device. This should only suspend the device and its
+ * RPM-linked supplier, not the non-RPM-linked supplier.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, pm_runtime_put_sync(dev));
+ /* Note: supplier suspend is async, so we have to flush the queue. */
+ flush_workqueue(pm_wq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(dev));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_active(norpm_supplier));
+
+ /* Now suspend non-RPM-linked supplier. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, pm_runtime_suspend(norpm_supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(dev));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(supplier));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, pm_runtime_suspended(norpm_supplier));
+}
+
static struct kunit_case pm_runtime_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_depth_test),
KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_already_suspended_test),
@@ -236,6 +292,7 @@ static struct kunit_case pm_runtime_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_disabled_test),
KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_error_test),
KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_probe_active_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(pm_runtime_supplier_suspend_test),
{}
};
--
2.55.0.970.g62bdec98f9-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 1:23 [PATCH 1/2] PM: runtime: Only queue an idle check for RPM-linked suppliers Brian Norris
2026-09-01 1:23 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2026-09-11 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901013341.1417232-2-briannorris@chromium.org \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox