From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Elif Topuz <elif.topuz@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Shubhang Kaushik <sh@gentwo.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Drop idle recency from slow-path CPU selection
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:01:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916100116.701206-2-christian.loehle@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916100116.701206-1-christian.loehle@arm.com>
The slow-path CPU picker favours the most recently idle CPU as a proxy
for cache warmth.
A more recent idle stamp may make ongoing entry more likely. Among CPUs
with equal advertised exit latency, this may favour the one with the
highest wakeup cost: if entry cannot be aborted, it must finish entry and
then exit, while an already-resident CPU only needs to exit. The same
advertised worst-case latency covers both cases.
idle_stamp does not track the current CPUIdle entry, so an older
scheduler-idle CPU may also be re-entering.
A recent scheduler-idle transition may also mark a short gap in recurring
task activity, so the CPU may soon be busy again.
Drop the timestamp tie-break, retaining the first idle candidate unless
a lower advertised exit latency is found.
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7455a83a6a99..ff5793bddc35 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8459,7 +8459,6 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *
{
unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
unsigned int min_exit_latency = UINT_MAX;
- u64 latest_idle_timestamp = 0;
int least_loaded_cpu = this_cpu;
int shallowest_idle_cpu = -1;
int i;
@@ -8480,23 +8479,11 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *
if (available_idle_cpu(i)) {
struct cpuidle_state *idle = idle_get_state(rq);
if (idle && idle->exit_latency < min_exit_latency) {
- /*
- * We give priority to a CPU whose idle state
- * has the smallest exit latency irrespective
- * of any idle timestamp.
- */
min_exit_latency = idle->exit_latency;
- latest_idle_timestamp = rq->idle_stamp;
shallowest_idle_cpu = i;
} else if ((!idle || idle->exit_latency == min_exit_latency) &&
- rq->idle_stamp > latest_idle_timestamp) {
- /*
- * If equal or no active idle state, then
- * the most recently idled CPU might have
- * a warmer cache.
- */
- latest_idle_timestamp = rq->idle_stamp;
+ shallowest_idle_cpu == -1) {
shallowest_idle_cpu = i;
}
} else if (shallowest_idle_cpu == -1) {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 10:01 [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Randomize equally shallow idle CPU picks Christian Loehle
2026-09-16 10:01 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-09-17 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Drop idle recency from slow-path CPU selection Vincent Guittot
2026-09-16 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Randomize equally shallow slow-path candidates Christian Loehle
2026-09-16 11:06 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-16 11:10 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-16 11:12 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-16 11:46 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-16 19:43 ` Shubhang
2026-09-17 7:47 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-17 9:58 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-17 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-17 14:16 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-17 14:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-17 14:22 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-17 15:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-17 15:17 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-24 12:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Randomize equally shallow idle CPU picks Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916100116.701206-2-christian.loehle@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=elif.topuz@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sh@gentwo.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox