From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: schedutil: Serialize start against rate limit updates
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 00:58:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007155820.3194105-1-sh_def@163.com> (raw)
rate_limit_us_store() is called with the governor attribute set
update_lock held, but sugov_start() updates freq_update_delay_ns from
the same tunable without taking that lock.
This allows the two paths to interleave as follows:
sugov_start() rate_limit_us_store()
read old rate_limit_us
write new rate_limit_us
publish the new delay
publish the old delay
The sysfs tunable then contains the new value while
freq_update_delay_ns contains the old one. Unlike a transient torn
read, the stale delay remains in effect until another rate limit update
or governor restart.
Serialize sugov_start() against sysfs stores by taking the existing
governor attribute set lock around sugov_update_rate_limit_us(). Use
gov_attr_set_lock() and gov_attr_set_unlock() to keep locking details
within the attribute set interface. This keeps the fix off the scheduler
hot path.
Fixes: 9bdcb44e391d ("cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on scheduler utilization data")
Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Wrap governor attribute set locking in helpers as suggested by
Zhongqiu Han.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260929103635.3780346-1-sh_def@163.com/
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 35ce665edfd8..5448eb0a0885 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -694,6 +694,16 @@ static inline struct gov_attr_set *to_gov_attr_set(struct kobject *kobj)
return container_of(kobj, struct gov_attr_set, kobj);
}
+static inline void gov_attr_set_lock(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&attr_set->update_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void gov_attr_set_unlock(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&attr_set->update_lock);
+}
+
void gov_attr_set_init(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
void gov_attr_set_get(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
unsigned int gov_attr_set_put(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 49ccd6f1c185..b847311c307d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -861,7 +861,11 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
void (*uu)(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, unsigned int flags);
unsigned int cpu;
+ /* Serialize against rate_limit_us_store(). */
+ gov_attr_set_lock(&sg_policy->tunables->attr_set);
sugov_update_rate_limit_us(sg_policy);
+ gov_attr_set_unlock(&sg_policy->tunables->attr_set);
+
sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = 0;
sg_policy->next_freq = 0;
sg_policy->work_in_progress = false;
base-commit: 63de2367f6d280904a9c5e5bbc7c75bb91c5b3d8
reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007155820.3194105-1-sh_def@163.com \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox