From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Li, Philip" <philip.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Thermal management updates for v4.17-rc1
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:12:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2093381.eDLEWQi9DB@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10298074.ogKH1ypqfx@amdc3058>
On Friday, April 13, 2018 12:41:18 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday, April 13, 2018 12:30:04 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 13/04/2018 11:28, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > >>> It is okay to return 0 because this code-path (the default one) will be
> > >>> never hit by the driver (probe makes sure of it) - the default case is
> > >>> here is just to silence compilation errors..
> > >>
> > >> The init function is making sure cal_type is one or another. Can you fix
> > >> it correctly by replacing the 'switch' by a 'if' instead of adding dead
> > >> branches to please gcc?
> > >>
> > >> if (data->cal_type == TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING) {
> > >> return ...;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> return ...;
> > >
> > > I'm not the one that added this switch statement (it has been there since
> > > 2011) and I would be happy to remove it.
> >
> > Actually the switch statement was fine until the cleanup.
>
> I don't see how it was fine before as the driver has never used the default
> case (always used TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING or TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING).
>
> Could you please explain this more?
>
> > > However could we please defer
> > > this to v4.17 and merge the current set of Exynos thermal fixes/cleanups
> > > (they simplify the driver a lot and make ground for future changes)?
> >
> > Regarding the latest comment, this can be fixed properly by 'return' (or
> > whatever you want which does not get around of gcc warnings).
>
> Do you mean that you want the patch with switch statement removal?
>
> Is incremental fix OK or do you want something else?
Danial has already posted it, I hope the fix is fine with you.
Also sorry for the delay with handling issue - I was on holiday last two
days and for some reason I was under (wrong) impression that the previous
fix has been in thermal tree (so I was quite surprised today reading this
mail thread).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-13 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-11 8:41 [GIT PULL] Thermal management updates for v4.17-rc1 Zhang Rui
2018-04-12 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 5:08 ` Zhang Rui
2018-04-12 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 17:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-13 4:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-04-13 5:29 ` Zhang Rui
2018-04-13 5:39 ` Zhang Rui
2018-04-13 8:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 9:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <CGME20180413090820epcas1p17dd97e3815909e0714f9d5a80eb82be9@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-04-13 9:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 9:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <CGME20180413092901epcas2p43245301152a01c782620f0ab95b2a692@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2018-04-13 9:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 10:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <CGME20180413104120epcas1p319b9e78b025cb68f810f047c67a48362@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2018-04-13 10:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 11:00 ` [PATCH] thermal/drivers/exynos_tmu: Fix warnings in temp_to_code / code_to_temp Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-13 11:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 11:10 ` [GIT PULL] Thermal management updates for v4.17-rc1 Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <CGME20180413111242epcas1p4cd5ecac004dd9c1e00e1608088ff88e2@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2018-04-13 11:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20180413112148epcas1p3f657cb50af4151d41f8c404e6b0d5fab@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2018-04-13 11:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-13 10:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-04-13 10:25 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-04-13 10:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-15 8:51 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-04-13 8:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2093381.eDLEWQi9DB@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).