linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ke.wang@spreadtrum.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
	robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs'
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:21:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20b096728a41a719bf8e45f99a0aadf142f60a03.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

It is called as 'cdbs' at most of the places and 'cpu_dbs' at others.
Lets use 'cdbs' consistently for better readability.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 529f236f2d05..4ea13f182154 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
 	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
 	unsigned int sampling_rate, ignore_nice, j, cpu = policy->cpu;
-	struct cpu_dbs_info *cpu_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
 	int io_busy = 0;
 
 	if (!policy->cur)
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	}
 
 	/* Initiate timer time stamp */
-	cpu_cdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
+	cdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
 
 	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay_for_sampling_rate(sampling_rate),
 		       true);
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
 	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
 	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
-	struct cpu_dbs_info *cpu_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
 
 	if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
 		struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
@@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
 
-	mutex_destroy(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex);
-	cpu_cdbs->cur_policy = NULL;
+	mutex_destroy(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
+	cdbs->cur_policy = NULL;
 }
 
 static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -417,20 +417,20 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
 	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
 	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
-	struct cpu_dbs_info *cpu_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
 
-	if (!cpu_cdbs->cur_policy)
+	if (!cdbs->cur_policy)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex);
-	if (policy->max < cpu_cdbs->cur_policy->cur)
-		__cpufreq_driver_target(cpu_cdbs->cur_policy, policy->max,
+	mutex_lock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
+	if (policy->max < cdbs->cur_policy->cur)
+		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->cur_policy, policy->max,
 					CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
-	else if (policy->min > cpu_cdbs->cur_policy->cur)
-		__cpufreq_driver_target(cpu_cdbs->cur_policy, policy->min,
+	else if (policy->min > cdbs->cur_policy->cur)
+		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->cur_policy, policy->min,
 					CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
 	dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
 }
 
 int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-- 
2.4.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: governor: Name delayed-work as dwork Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:01   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused field 'cpu' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:12   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq: governor: Rename 'cpu_dbs_common_info' to 'cpu_dbs_info' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  6:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-15  4:22   ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs' Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq: governor: rename cur_policy as policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  4:24   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  6:15   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  6:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:59     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-19  4:13       ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: governor: split out common part of {cs|od}_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  7:03   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:23   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  8:31     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq: governor: Avoid invalid states with additional checks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:59   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  9:12     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Don't WARN on invalid states Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  9:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:30   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:40   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  4:49 ` [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  5:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-16  2:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:19   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20b096728a41a719bf8e45f99a0aadf142f60a03.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ke.wang@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
    --cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).