From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:07:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20e4ffb8-905a-92e2-8ea2-6116e8031dac@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712084137.pb24lolhuk2yln4e@vireshk-i7>
On 7/12/22 09:41, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-07-22, 13:42, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> There is no need to keep the max CPU capacity in the per_cpu instance.
>> Furthermore, there is no need to check and update that variable
>> (sg_cpu->max) everytime in the frequency change request, which is part
>> of hot path. Instead use struct sugov_policy to store that information.
>> Initialize the max CPU capacity during the setup and start callback.
>> We can do that since all CPUs in the same frequency domain have the same
>> max capacity (capacity setup and thermal pressure are based on that).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> I tried to check all possible combinations on how this can break, but
> couldn't find one. I had to check that as this code is there since
> ages and none of us thought of it, which was surprising.
I thought the same.
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
Thanks for the ACK!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 12:42 [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy Lukasz Luba
2022-07-12 8:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-07-12 10:07 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2022-07-15 8:47 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-07-15 11:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-07-15 11:47 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-07-15 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-07-25 8:07 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-07-26 8:26 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20e4ffb8-905a-92e2-8ea2-6116e8031dac@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox