[PATCH v4 02/21] thermal/drivers/sun8i: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[PATCH v4 02/21] thermal/drivers/sun8i: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
index 195f3c5d0b38..a952804ff993 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
@@ -512,9 +512,9 @@ static int sun8i_ths_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * registered yet, we deffer the registration of the interrupt to
 	 * the end.
 	 */
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
-					sun8i_irq_thread,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT, "ths", tmdev);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, NULL,
+					      sun8i_irq_thread,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT, "ths", tmdev, NULL);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 03/21] thermal/drivers/armada: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
index 9f6dc4fc9112..b7f549b6f825 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
@@ -913,15 +913,12 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* The overheat interrupt feature is not mandatory */
 	if (irq > 0) {
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
-						armada_overheat_isr,
-						armada_overheat_isr_thread,
-						0, NULL, priv);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot request threaded IRQ %d\n",
-				irq);
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq,
+						      armada_overheat_isr,
+						      armada_overheat_isr_thread,
+						      0, NULL, priv, NULL);
+		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 04/21] thermal/drivers/broadcom: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
index 72d1dbe60b8f..ea37e7ee688a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c
@@ -349,14 +349,12 @@ static int brcmstb_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
 	if (irq >= 0) {
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
-						brcmstb_tmon_irq_thread,
-						IRQF_ONESHOT,
-						DRV_NAME, priv);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not request IRQ: %d\n", ret);
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
+						      brcmstb_tmon_irq_thread,
+						      IRQF_ONESHOT,
+						      DRV_NAME, priv, NULL);
+		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "registered AVS TMON of-sensor driver\n");
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 05/21] thermal/drivers/tegra: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c        | 38 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c |  9 +++---
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
index ea66cba09e56..3d144377d90a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
@@ -1993,29 +1993,27 @@ static int soctherm_interrupts_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev,
-					tegra->thermal_irq,
-					soctherm_thermal_isr,
-					soctherm_thermal_isr_thread,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					dev_name(&pdev->dev),
-					tegra);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_irq 'thermal_irq' failed.\n");
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev,
+					      tegra->thermal_irq,
+					      soctherm_thermal_isr,
+					      soctherm_thermal_isr_thread,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					      dev_name(&pdev->dev),
+					      tegra,
+					      "thermal_irq");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev,
-					tegra->edp_irq,
-					soctherm_edp_isr,
-					soctherm_edp_isr_thread,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					"soctherm_edp",
-					tegra);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_irq 'edp_irq' failed.\n");
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev,
+					      tegra->edp_irq,
+					      soctherm_edp_isr,
+					      soctherm_edp_isr_thread,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					      "soctherm_edp",
+					      tegra,
+					      "edp_irq");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
index c243e9d76d3c..dd4c2deba93a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
@@ -593,12 +593,11 @@ static int tegra_tsensor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return err;
 	}
 
-	err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
-					tegra_tsensor_isr, IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					"tegra_tsensor", ts);
+	err = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
+					      tegra_tsensor_isr, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					      "tegra_tsensor", ts, NULL);
 	if (err)
-		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err,
-				     "failed to request interrupt\n");
+		return err;
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 06/21] thermal/drivers/db8500: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 16 ++++++----------
 drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c       |  7 +++----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
index fca5c2c93bf9..0ef8fc2eb4a1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
@@ -164,25 +164,21 @@ static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (low_irq < 0)
 		return low_irq;
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, low_irq, NULL,
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, low_irq, NULL,
 		prcmu_low_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
-		"dbx500_temp_low", th);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp low irq\n");
+		"dbx500_temp_low", th, "temp low");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	high_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH");
 	if (high_irq < 0)
 		return high_irq;
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, high_irq, NULL,
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, high_irq, NULL,
 		prcmu_high_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
-		"dbx500_temp_high", th);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp high irq\n");
+		"dbx500_temp_high", th, "temp high");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	/* register of thermal sensor and get info from DT */
 	th->tz = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(dev, 0, th, &thdev_ops);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
index f6edb12ec004..48a14d7e8bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
@@ -207,11 +207,10 @@ static int lmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* Disable the irq and let cpufreq enable it when ready to handle the interrupt */
 	irq_set_status_flags(lmh_data->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
-	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
-			       IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
-			       "lmh-irq", lmh_data);
+	ret = devm_request_irq_probe(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
+				     IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
+				     "lmh-irq", lmh_data, NULL);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Error %d registering irq %x\n", ret, lmh_data->irq);
 		irq_domain_remove(lmh_data->domain);
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 07/21] thermal/drivers/rcar: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
index b8571f7090aa..56f3983dcd5f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
@@ -446,12 +446,10 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			idle = 0; /* polling delay is not needed */
 		}
 
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, rcar_thermal_irq,
-				       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), common);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n ");
+		ret = devm_request_irq_probe(dev, irq, rcar_thermal_irq,
+					     IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), common, NULL);
+		if (ret)
 			goto error_unregister;
-		}
 
 		/* update ENR bits */
 		if (chip->irq_per_ch)
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 08/21] thermal/drivers/qcom/temp-alarm: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c
index 0e8ebfcd84c5..1b4a7eca181e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c
@@ -455,8 +455,8 @@ static int qpnp_tm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(&pdev->dev, chip->tz_dev);
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, qpnp_tm_isr,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT, node->name, chip);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, qpnp_tm_isr,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT, node->name, chip, NULL);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 09/21] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 .../intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
index 0d1e98007270..ee766904b314 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
@@ -258,13 +258,10 @@ static int proc_thermal_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_
 		irq_flag = IRQF_SHARED;
 
 	irq =  pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
-					proc_thermal_irq_handler, NULL,
-					irq_flag, KBUILD_MODNAME, pci_info);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request IRQ %d failed\n", pdev->irq);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, proc_thermal_irq_handler,
+					      NULL, irq_flag, KBUILD_MODNAME, pci_info, NULL);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_free_vectors;
-	}
 
 	ret = thermal_zone_device_enable(pci_info->tzone);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 10/21] thermal/drivers/exynos: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 45e5c840d130..697d2fbdb1bf 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -1100,12 +1100,11 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_sclk;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, data->irq, exynos_tmu_irq,
-		IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), data);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq: %d\n", data->irq);
+	ret = devm_request_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, data->irq, exynos_tmu_irq,
+				     IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_SHARED,
+				     dev_name(&pdev->dev), data, NULL);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_sclk;
-	}
 
 	exynos_tmu_control(pdev, true);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 11/21] thermal/drivers/hisi: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
index 3f09ef8be41a..ee5f50fb2b68 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
@@ -576,14 +576,12 @@ static int hisi_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ret, NULL,
-						hisi_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
-						IRQF_ONESHOT, sensor->irq_name,
-						sensor);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(dev, "Failed to request alarm irq: %d\n", ret);
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, ret, NULL,
+						      hisi_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
+						      IRQF_ONESHOT, sensor->irq_name,
+						      sensor, "alarm");
+		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
-		}
 
 		ret = data->ops->enable_sensor(sensor);
 		if (ret) {
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 12/21] thermal/drivers/rockchip: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index 77231a9d28ff..11061f6ef323 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -1577,13 +1577,12 @@ static int rockchip_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				"failed to register sensor[%d].\n", i);
 	}
 
-	error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
-					  &rockchip_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
-					  IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					  "rockchip_thermal", thermal);
+	error = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
+						&rockchip_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
+						IRQF_ONESHOT,
+						"rockchip_thermal", thermal, "tsadc");
 	if (error)
-		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, error,
-				     "failed to request tsadc irq.\n");
+		return error;
 
 	thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, true);
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 13/21] drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
index 9029d01e029b..ff9cd43e1881 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
@@ -467,9 +467,10 @@ static int rcar_gen3_thermal_request_irqs(struct rcar_gen3_thermal_priv *priv,
 		if (!irqname)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
-						rcar_gen3_thermal_irq,
-						IRQF_ONESHOT, irqname, priv);
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, NULL,
+						      rcar_gen3_thermal_irq,
+						      IRQF_ONESHOT, irqname,
+						      priv, NULL);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 14/21] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
index b693fac2d677..1e12410820df 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
@@ -1148,10 +1148,10 @@ static int lvts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * At this point the LVTS is initialized and enabled. We can
 	 * safely enable the interrupt.
 	 */
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, lvts_irq_handler,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), lvts_td);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, NULL, lvts_irq_handler,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), lvts_td, NULL);
 	if (ret)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to request interrupt\n");
+		return ret;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lvts_td);
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 15/21] thermal: max77620: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
index 61c7622d9945..92289498fa17 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
@@ -121,23 +121,19 @@ static int max77620_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, mtherm->irq_tjalarm1, NULL,
-					max77620_thermal_irq,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
-					dev_name(&pdev->dev), mtherm);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq1: %d\n", ret);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, mtherm->irq_tjalarm1, NULL,
+					      max77620_thermal_irq,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
+					      dev_name(&pdev->dev), mtherm, "irq1");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, mtherm->irq_tjalarm2, NULL,
-					max77620_thermal_irq,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
-					dev_name(&pdev->dev), mtherm);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq2: %d\n", ret);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, mtherm->irq_tjalarm2, NULL,
+					      max77620_thermal_irq,
+					      IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
+					      dev_name(&pdev->dev), mtherm, "irq2");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtherm);
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 16/21] thermal/drivers/intel/bxt_pmic: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
index 6312c6ba081f..1bf3e6bf8052 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_bxt_pmic_thermal.c
@@ -241,14 +241,11 @@ static int pmic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return virq;
 		}
 
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, virq,
-				NULL, pmic_thermal_irq_handler,
-				IRQF_ONESHOT, "pmic_thermal", pdev);
-
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "request irq(%d) failed: %d\n", virq, ret);
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, virq, NULL,
+						      pmic_thermal_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+						      "pmic_thermal", pdev, NULL);
+		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		}
 		pmic_irq_count++;
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 17/21] thermal/drivers/stm: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c | 12 +++++-------
 drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c       | 13 ++++---------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
index e8cfa83b724a..40bb318b5489 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal_memmap.c
@@ -97,14 +97,12 @@ static int st_mmap_register_enable_irq(struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor)
 	if (sensor->irq < 0)
 		return sensor->irq;
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, sensor->irq,
-					NULL, st_mmap_thermal_trip_handler,
-					IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					dev->driver->name, sensor);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to register IRQ %d\n", sensor->irq);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, sensor->irq,
+					      NULL, st_mmap_thermal_trip_handler,
+					      IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					      dev->driver->name, sensor, NULL);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	return st_mmap_enable_irq(sensor);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
index 903fcf1763f1..6a36a7eab9bd 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
@@ -387,16 +387,11 @@ static int stm_register_irq(struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor)
 	if (sensor->irq < 0)
 		return sensor->irq;
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, sensor->irq,
-					NULL,
-					stm_thermal_irq_handler,
-					IRQF_ONESHOT,
-					dev->driver->name, sensor);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to register IRQ %d\n", __func__,
-			sensor->irq);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, sensor->irq, NULL,
+					      stm_thermal_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					      dev->driver->name, sensor, NULL);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: thermal IRQ registered", __func__);
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 18/21] thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens-v0_1: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
index 98c356acfe98..d4528d36c085 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
@@ -1171,21 +1171,18 @@ static int tsens_register_irq(struct tsens_priv *priv, char *irqname,
 	} else {
 		/* VER_0 interrupt is TRIGGER_RISING, VER_0_1 and up is ONESHOT */
 		if (tsens_version(priv) == VER_0)
-			ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
-							thread_fn, NULL,
-							IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
-							dev_name(&pdev->dev),
-							priv);
+			ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq,
+							      thread_fn, NULL,
+							      IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
+							      dev_name(&pdev->dev),
+							      priv, NULL);
 		else
-			ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
-							thread_fn, IRQF_ONESHOT,
-							dev_name(&pdev->dev),
-							priv);
+			ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
+							      thread_fn, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+							      dev_name(&pdev->dev),
+							      priv, NULL);
 
-		if (ret)
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get irq\n",
-				__func__);
-		else
+		if (!ret)
 			enable_irq_wake(irq);
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 19/21] thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
index 5ddc39b2be32..90d46dc60806 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
@@ -1044,8 +1044,9 @@ static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm->data->isr,
-			IRQF_ONESHOT, adc_tm->data->irq_name, adc_tm);
+	return devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm->data->isr,
+					       IRQF_ONESHOT, adc_tm->data->irq_name,
+					       adc_tm, NULL);
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id adc_tm5_match_table[] = {
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 20/21] thermal/drivers/uniphier: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
index aef6119cc004..34d8eb2138d3 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/uniphier_thermal.c
@@ -278,9 +278,9 @@ static int uniphier_tm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, uniphier_tm_alarm_irq,
-					uniphier_tm_alarm_irq_thread,
-					0, "thermal", tdev);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, uniphier_tm_alarm_irq,
+					      uniphier_tm_alarm_irq_thread,
+					      0, "thermal", tdev, NULL);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 21/21] thermal/drivers/imx: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.

And tglx point out that:

  If we actually look at the call sites of
  devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
  less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed

     519 messages total (there are probably more)

     352 unique messages

     323 unique messages after lower casing

         Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
         slight modifications in formatting and information provided.

     186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
         e.g. "no irq", "

     The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"

  So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
  function should print a well formatted and informative error message.

  It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
  vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
  device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
  the device cannot be used _is_ useful.

So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
error handling branches print error information.

In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
index a94ec0a0c9dd..3131a09f9906 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
@@ -746,13 +746,12 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto thermal_zone_unregister;
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, data->irq,
-			imx_thermal_alarm_irq, imx_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
-			0, "imx_thermal", data);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request alarm irq: %d\n", ret);
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, data->irq,
+					      imx_thermal_alarm_irq,
+					      imx_thermal_alarm_irq_thread,
+					      0, "imx_thermal", data, "alarm");
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto thermal_zone_unregister;
-	}
 
 	pm_runtime_put(data->dev);
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH v4 10/21] thermal/drivers/exynos: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/07/2023 11:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>      352 unique messages
> 
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 12/21] thermal/drivers/rockchip: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Montag, 10. Juli 2023, 11:59:16 CEST schrieb Yangtao Li:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>      352 unique messages
> 
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>

Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] thermal/drivers/db8500: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>       352 unique messages
> 
>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>           e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 16 ++++++----------
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c       |  7 +++----

Please split LMH to a separate driver.

>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> index fca5c2c93bf9..0ef8fc2eb4a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> @@ -164,25 +164,21 @@ static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (low_irq < 0)
>   		return low_irq;
>   
> -	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, low_irq, NULL,
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, low_irq, NULL,
>   		prcmu_low_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> -		"dbx500_temp_low", th);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp low irq\n");
> +		"dbx500_temp_low", th, "temp low");
> +	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
> -	}
>   
>   	high_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH");
>   	if (high_irq < 0)
>   		return high_irq;
>   
> -	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, high_irq, NULL,
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, high_irq, NULL,
>   		prcmu_high_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> -		"dbx500_temp_high", th);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp high irq\n");
> +		"dbx500_temp_high", th, "temp high");
> +	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* register of thermal sensor and get info from DT */
>   	th->tz = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(dev, 0, th, &thdev_ops);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> index f6edb12ec004..48a14d7e8bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> @@ -207,11 +207,10 @@ static int lmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	/* Disable the irq and let cpufreq enable it when ready to handle the interrupt */
>   	irq_set_status_flags(lmh_data->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> -	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
> -			       IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> -			       "lmh-irq", lmh_data);
> +	ret = devm_request_irq_probe(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
> +				     IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> +				     "lmh-irq", lmh_data, NULL);
>   	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Error %d registering irq %x\n", ret, lmh_data->irq);
>   		irq_domain_remove(lmh_data->domain);
>   		return ret;
>   	}

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v4 08/21] thermal/drivers/qcom/temp-alarm: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>       352 unique messages
> 
>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>           e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v4 18/21] thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens-v0_1: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>       352 unique messages
> 
>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>           e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v4 19/21] thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>       352 unique messages
> 
>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>           e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] thermal/drivers/db8500: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Yangtao Li]

Hi Dmitry,

On 2023/7/10 19:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

> On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
>> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
>> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
>> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
>> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
>> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
>>
>> And tglx point out that:
>>
>>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print 
>> more or
>>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
>>
>>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
>>
>>       352 unique messages
>>
>>       323 unique messages after lower casing
>>
>>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
>>
>>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>>           e.g. "no irq", "
>>
>>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
>>
>>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
>>
>>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and 
>> in the
>>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
>>
>> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
>> error handling branches print error information.
>>
>> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
>> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
>> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
>> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 16 ++++++----------
>>   drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c       |  7 +++----
>
> Please split LMH to a separate driver.


Sorry for mixing these two patches together,

can I add your Reviewed-by tag when the patch is resubmitted for the 
next version?


Thx,

Yangtao

>
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c 
>> b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
>> index fca5c2c93bf9..0ef8fc2eb4a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
>> @@ -164,25 +164,21 @@ static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       if (low_irq < 0)
>>           return low_irq;
>>   -    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, low_irq, NULL,
>> +    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, low_irq, NULL,
>>           prcmu_low_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> -        "dbx500_temp_low", th);
>> -    if (ret < 0) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp low irq\n");
>> +        "dbx500_temp_low", th, "temp low");
>> +    if (ret < 0)
>>           return ret;
>> -    }
>>         high_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH");
>>       if (high_irq < 0)
>>           return high_irq;
>>   -    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, high_irq, NULL,
>> +    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, high_irq, NULL,
>>           prcmu_high_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> -        "dbx500_temp_high", th);
>> -    if (ret < 0) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp high irq\n");
>> +        "dbx500_temp_high", th, "temp high");
>> +    if (ret < 0)
>>           return ret;
>> -    }
>>         /* register of thermal sensor and get info from DT */
>>       th->tz = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(dev, 0, th, &thdev_ops);
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
>> index f6edb12ec004..48a14d7e8bf5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
>> @@ -207,11 +207,10 @@ static int lmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         /* Disable the irq and let cpufreq enable it when ready to 
>> handle the interrupt */
>>       irq_set_status_flags(lmh_data->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>> -    ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
>> -                   IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
>> -                   "lmh-irq", lmh_data);
>> +    ret = devm_request_irq_probe(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
>> +                     IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
>> +                     "lmh-irq", lmh_data, NULL);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Error %d registering irq %x\n", ret, 
>> lmh_data->irq);
>>           irq_domain_remove(lmh_data->domain);
>>           return ret;
>>       }
>

Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] thermal/drivers/db8500: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 14:30, Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 2023/7/10 19:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > On 10/07/2023 12:59, Yangtao Li wrote:
> >> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> >> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> >> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> >> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> >> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> >>
> >> And tglx point out that:
> >>
> >>    If we actually look at the call sites of
> >>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print
> >> more or
> >>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> >>
> >>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> >>
> >>       352 unique messages
> >>
> >>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> >>
> >>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
> >>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> >>
> >>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
> >>           e.g. "no irq", "
> >>
> >>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> >>
> >>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
> >>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> >>
> >>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and
> >> in the
> >>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
> >>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
> >>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> >>
> >> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> >> error handling branches print error information.
> >>
> >> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> >> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> >> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> >>
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> >> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >>   drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c       |  7 +++----
> >
> > Please split LMH to a separate driver.
>
>
> Sorry for mixing these two patches together,
>
> can I add your Reviewed-by tag when the patch is resubmitted for the
> next version?

Yes, please add it to the LMH patch.

>
>
> Thx,
>
> Yangtao
>
> >
> >>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> >> b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> >> index fca5c2c93bf9..0ef8fc2eb4a1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c
> >> @@ -164,25 +164,21 @@ static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct
> >> platform_device *pdev)
> >>       if (low_irq < 0)
> >>           return low_irq;
> >>   -    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, low_irq, NULL,
> >> +    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, low_irq, NULL,
> >>           prcmu_low_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >> -        "dbx500_temp_low", th);
> >> -    if (ret < 0) {
> >> -        dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp low irq\n");
> >> +        "dbx500_temp_low", th, "temp low");
> >> +    if (ret < 0)
> >>           return ret;
> >> -    }
> >>         high_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH");
> >>       if (high_irq < 0)
> >>           return high_irq;
> >>   -    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, high_irq, NULL,
> >> +    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, high_irq, NULL,
> >>           prcmu_high_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >> -        "dbx500_temp_high", th);
> >> -    if (ret < 0) {
> >> -        dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate temp high irq\n");
> >> +        "dbx500_temp_high", th, "temp high");
> >> +    if (ret < 0)
> >>           return ret;
> >> -    }
> >>         /* register of thermal sensor and get info from DT */
> >>       th->tz = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(dev, 0, th, &thdev_ops);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> >> index f6edb12ec004..48a14d7e8bf5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> >> @@ -207,11 +207,10 @@ static int lmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>         /* Disable the irq and let cpufreq enable it when ready to
> >> handle the interrupt */
> >>       irq_set_status_flags(lmh_data->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> >> -    ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
> >> -                   IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> >> -                   "lmh-irq", lmh_data);
> >> +    ret = devm_request_irq_probe(dev, lmh_data->irq, lmh_handle_irq,
> >> +                     IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> >> +                     "lmh-irq", lmh_data, NULL);
> >>       if (ret) {
> >> -        dev_err(dev, "Error %d registering irq %x\n", ret,
> >> lmh_data->irq);
> >>           irq_domain_remove(lmh_data->domain);
> >>           return ret;
> >>       }
> >



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v4 07/21] thermal/drivers/rcar: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:07 PM Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
>
> And tglx point out that:
>
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
>
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
>
>      352 unique messages
>
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
>
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
>
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
>
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
>
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
>
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
>
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
>
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH v4 13/21] drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:10 PM Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
>
> And tglx point out that:
>
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
>
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
>
>      352 unique messages
>
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
>
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
>
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
>
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
>
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
>
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
>
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
>
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH v4 05/21] thermal/drivers/tegra: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:59:09PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>      352 unique messages
> 
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.

Do we really need to keep repeating this same commit message for each
and everyone of these commits? It's already in the cover letter and
presumably on the patch that introduces the new helper, so surely we can
come up with a denser version for individual subsystem patches.

Other than that this looks good:

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v4 05/21] thermal/drivers/tegra: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/07/2023 15:16, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:59:09PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
>> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
>> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
>> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
>> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
>> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
>>
>> And tglx point out that:
>>
>>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
>>
>>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
>>
>>      352 unique messages
>>
>>      323 unique messages after lower casing
>>
>>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
>>
>>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>>          e.g. "no irq", "
>>
>>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
>>
>>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
>>
>>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
>>
>> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
>> error handling branches print error information.
>>
>> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
>> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
>> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Do we really need to keep repeating this same commit message for each
> and everyone of these commits? It's already in the cover letter and
> presumably on the patch that introduces the new helper, so surely we can
> come up with a denser version for individual subsystem patches.

Yeah, this is way too long to put in every commit doing the same but for
different drivers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 09/21] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:00 PM Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
>
> And tglx point out that:
>
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
>
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
>
>      352 unique messages
>
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
>
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
>
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
>
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
>
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
>
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
>
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
>
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>

> ---
>  .../intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
> index 0d1e98007270..ee766904b314 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c
> @@ -258,13 +258,10 @@ static int proc_thermal_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_
>                 irq_flag = IRQF_SHARED;
>
>         irq =  pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
> -       ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> -                                       proc_thermal_irq_handler, NULL,
> -                                       irq_flag, KBUILD_MODNAME, pci_info);
> -       if (ret) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request IRQ %d failed\n", pdev->irq);
> +       ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(&pdev->dev, irq, proc_thermal_irq_handler,
> +                                             NULL, irq_flag, KBUILD_MODNAME, pci_info, NULL);
> +       if (ret)
>                 goto err_free_vectors;
> -       }
>
>         ret = thermal_zone_device_enable(pci_info->tzone);
>         if (ret)
> --
> 2.39.0
>

Re: [PATCH v4 14/21] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 10/07/23 11:59, Yangtao Li ha scritto:
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>    If we actually look at the call sites of
>    devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>    less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>       519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>       352 unique messages
> 
>       323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>           Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>           slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>       186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>           e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>       The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>    So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>    function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>    It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>    vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>    device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>    the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH v4 02/21] thermal/drivers/sun8i: convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe()

[Jernej Škrabec]

Dne ponedeljek, 10. julij 2023 ob 11:59:06 CEST je Yangtao Li napisal(a):
> There are more than 700 calls to devm_request_threaded_irq method and
> more than 1000 calls to devm_request_irq method. Most drivers only
> request one interrupt resource, and these error messages are basically
> the same. If error messages are printed everywhere, more than 2000 lines
> of code can be saved by removing the msg in the driver.
> 
> And tglx point out that:
> 
>   If we actually look at the call sites of
>   devm_request_threaded_irq() then the vast majority of them print more or
>   less lousy error messages. A quick grep/sed/awk/sort/uniq revealed
> 
>      519 messages total (there are probably more)
> 
>      352 unique messages
> 
>      323 unique messages after lower casing
> 
>          Those 323 are mostly just variants of the same patterns with
>          slight modifications in formatting and information provided.
> 
>      186 of these messages do not deliver any useful information,
>          e.g. "no irq", "
> 
>      The most useful one of all is: "could request wakeup irq: %d"
> 
>   So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular
>   function should print a well formatted and informative error message.
> 
>   It's not a general allocator like kmalloc(). It's specialized and in the
>   vast majority of cases failing to request the interrupt causes the
>   device probe to fail. So having proper and consistent information why
>   the device cannot be used _is_ useful.
> 
> So convert to use devm_request*_irq_probe() API, which ensure that all
> error handling branches print error information.
> 
> In this way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can
> directly return an error code without missing debugging information.
> Otherwise, the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jernej

>  drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> index 195f3c5d0b38..a952804ff993 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> @@ -512,9 +512,9 @@ static int sun8i_ths_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * registered yet, we deffer the registration of the interrupt to
>  	 * the end.
>  	 */
> -	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
> -					sun8i_irq_thread,
> -					IRQF_ONESHOT, "ths", tmdev);
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq_probe(dev, irq, NULL,
> +					      sun8i_irq_thread,
> +					      IRQF_ONESHOT, "ths", tmdev, NULL);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>