From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, currojerez@riseup.net,
ggherdovich@suse.cz, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2115864.0gBFVHkxzn@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244c5d6-460e-0e0b-b7bf-a46e73327383@intel.com>
On Monday, September 3, 2018 5:10:27 PM CEST Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> ...
> > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the patchset
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/
> > But he has to watch results for several days to check trend.
>
> It's close, but there is some gap compared to Francisco's version.
It is unclear what exactly you are referring to without a link to the
patch.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-31 17:28 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-09-03 15:10 ` Eero Tamminen
2018-09-03 15:15 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-09-04 6:53 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-04 17:50 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-09-05 1:37 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-05 5:59 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-09-06 4:20 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-11 11:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-11 17:35 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-14 8:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-15 6:34 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-17 9:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-17 21:23 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-09-11 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-09-11 10:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2115864.0gBFVHkxzn@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=currojerez@riseup.net \
--cc=eero.t.tamminen@intel.com \
--cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox