From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:29:27 +0200 Message-ID: <2145544.PRPhCeavDS@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <594b312d352b55f44d5ebea954fdf784e966867e.1467001203.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <6b89424cc08acf909f6ffc53d8028e5b7e5b23d0.1467023513.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57005 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751220AbcGGNYv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:24:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6b89424cc08acf909f6ffc53d8028e5b7e5b23d0.1467023513.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steve.muckle@linaro.org, francescolavra.fl@gmail.com On Monday, June 27, 2016 04:04:07 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > cpufreq drivers aren't required to provide a sorted frequency table > today, and even the ones which provide a sorted table aren't handled > efficiently by cpufreq core. > > This patch adds infrastructure to verify if the freq-table provided by > the drivers is sorted or not, and use efficient helpers if they are > sorted. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Applied, thanks!