From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] cpufreq-dt, platform_data based proposal Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:53:23 +0200 Message-ID: <2152065.1YrbYhlbqO@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1410350908-11316-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20141006091905.4e0d976a@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:51079 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750956AbaJFWdS (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:33:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141006091905.4e0d976a@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Petazzoni , Viresh Kumar Cc: Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Shawn Guo , Stephen Boyd , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Sachin Kamat , Thomas Abraham , Santosh Shilimkar , "pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com" , Rob Herring , Mike Turquette , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , Lior Amsalem On Monday, October 06, 2014 09:19:05 AM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:08:24 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Thomas Petazzoni (4): > > cpufreq: allow driver-specific data > > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: extend with platform_data > > ARM: mvebu: use the cpufreq-dt platform_data for independent clocks > > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: adjust message related to regulators > > > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c | 8 +++++++- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/cpufreq-dt.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++ > > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 include/linux/cpufreq-dt.h > > Since this series was Acked-by Viresh, would it be possible to get it > merged for 3.18 ? I'm still seeing discussion going on about patch [1/4], though. Is that irrelevant? Also I'd prefer Viresh to tell me that this is 3.18 material instead of sending ACKs in random replies and hoping that I'll notice them. I may not. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.