From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 2/6] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 10:05:52 +0100 Message-ID: <2273590.04PyvAHADg@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <2067762.1uWBf5RSRc@aspire.rjw.lan> <3346281.BDGJiv2ZOp@aspire.rjw.lan> <20180307233911.GB9367@lerouge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180307233911.GB9367@lerouge> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , Paul McKenney , Thomas Ilsche , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel , Aubrey Li , Mike Galbraith , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, March 8, 2018 12:39:12 AM CET Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/idle.c > > +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c > > @@ -220,13 +220,17 @@ static void do_idle(void) > > */ > > > > __current_set_polling(); > > - tick_nohz_idle_enter(); > > + tick_nohz_idle_prepare(); > > Since we leave tick_nohz_idle_exit() unchanged, can we keep tick_nohz_idle_prepare() > under the name tick_nohz_idle_enter() so that we stay symetric? And then make xen call > the two functions: > > tick_nohz_idle_enter(); > tick_nohz_idle_go_idle(); No problem with that. > Also can we rename tick_nohz_idle_go_idle() to tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() ? > This will be more self-explanatory. But it doesn't always stop the tick which is why I chose the other name.