public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Cpufreq: Make governor data on nonboot cpus across system suspend/resume
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:43:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2383693.rhJDd9X40m@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384616184-6197-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com>

On Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:36:24 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Currently, governor of nonboot cpus will be put to EXIT when system suspend.
> Since all these cpus will be unplugged and the governor usage_count decreases
> to zero. The governor data and its sysfs interfaces will be freed or released.
> This makes user config of these governors loss during suspend and resume.
> 
> This doesn't happen on the governor covering boot cpu because it isn't
> unplugged during system suspend.
> 
> To fix this issue, skipping governor exit during system suspend and check
> policy governor data to determine whether the governor is really needed
> to be initialized when do init. If not, return EALREADY to indicate the
> governor has been initialized and should do nothing. __cpufreq_governor()
> convert EALREADY to 0 as return value for INIT event since governor is
> still under INIT state and can do START operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> ---
> Change since v1:
> 	Change coding style.
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c          | 10 +++++++---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02d534d..73ad593 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
>  	if (cpus == 1) {
> -		if (has_target()) {
> +		if (has_target() && !frozen) {
>  			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy,
>  					CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
>  			if (ret) {
> @@ -1818,9 +1818,13 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||

The inner parens are not necessary.

> -			((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT) && !ret))
> +	if ((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) {

Same here.

> +		module_put(policy->governor->owner);
> +		if (ret == -EALREADY)
> +			return 0;
> +	} else if ((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT) && !ret) {

Same here.

>  		module_put(policy->governor->owner);
> +	}

Can you please combine these checks with the checks made right after
calling policy->governor->governor() as indicated by Viresh?

Rafael


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-21 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-15  6:01 [PATCH 1/1] Cpufreq: Make governor data on nonboot cpus across system syspend/resume Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15  8:15 ` [Update PATCH 1/1] Cpufreq: Make governor data on nonboot cpus across system suspend/resume Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 10:22   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-16  4:33     ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 10:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-16  5:24     ` viresh kumar
2013-11-16  0:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-16  3:59     ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-16 14:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-16 14:57         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-16 15:10           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-16 15:09         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-16 15:23         ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-16 15:36         ` [PATCH V2] " Lan Tianyu
2013-11-17  4:13           ` viresh kumar
2013-11-17 14:44             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-17 16:23               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-22  7:49             ` viresh kumar
2013-11-22  8:19               ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-22  8:39                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-21 14:43           ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-11-21 15:54             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-21 21:43               ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2383693.rhJDd9X40m@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox