linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org,
	Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V7 1/6] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive policies from sysfs
Date: Mon,  8 Jun 2015 18:25:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <243ddd967eebe1cafeda824a5ab5c67885d3653d.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Later commits would change the way policies are managed today. Policies
wouldn't be freed on cpu hotplug (currently they aren't freed only for
suspend), and while the CPU is offline, the sysfs cpufreq files would
still be present.

User may accidentally try to update the sysfs files in following
directory: '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/'. And that would
result in undefined behavior as policy wouldn't be active then.

Apart from updating the store() routine, we also update __cpufreq_get()
which can call cpufreq_out_of_sync(). The later routine tries to update
policy->cur and starts notifying kernel about it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 5d780ff5a10a..7eeff892c0a6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -875,11 +875,18 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
+	/* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
+	if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy))) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
+		goto unlock_policy_rwsem;
+	}
+
 	if (fattr->store)
 		ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
 	else
 		ret = -EIO;
 
+unlock_policy_rwsem:
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
@@ -1610,6 +1617,10 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
 
+	/* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
+	if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy)))
+		return ret_freq;
+
 	if (ret_freq && policy->cur &&
 		!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
 		/* verify no discrepancy between actual and
-- 
2.4.0


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-08 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-08 12:55 [PATCH V7 0/6] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 12:55 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-08 23:19   ` [PATCH V7 1/6] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive policies from sysfs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-09  2:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-09 21:50   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-06-08 12:55 ` [PATCH V7 2/6] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 23:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-09  2:50     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-10  0:20   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-06-10  2:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-10 23:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-08 12:55 ` [PATCH V7 3/6] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 12:55 ` [PATCH V7 4/6] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 12:55 ` [PATCH V7 5/6] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 23:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-09  3:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 12:55 ` [PATCH V7 6/6] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-08 23:17 ` [PATCH V7 0/6] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=243ddd967eebe1cafeda824a5ab5c67885d3653d.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).