From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2470259.jrumdYRmlv@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <04f401d0ce89$81073900$8315ab00$@kernel.org> <9283770.jQmuxWnYst@vostro.rjw.lan> <55C5B182.6000509@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:46917 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752744AbbHNJOm (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2015 05:14:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55C5B182.6000509@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Kukjin Kim , Viresh Kumar , Lukasz Majewski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list , shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com On Saturday, August 08, 2015 04:36:34 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > W dniu 06.08.2015 o 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki pisze: > > On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> From: Shailendra Verma > >> > >> During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of > >> unknown SoC type. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma > >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > >> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski > >> [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim > >> --- > >> Hi Rafael and Viresh, > >> > >> Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if > >> this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. > > > > I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be > > a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. > > > > Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, > > but there are none so far. > > The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with > patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this > patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not > marked as such). Since I have one more ACPI fix for 4.2, I've applied this one and will push it to Linus next week. Thanks, Rafael