From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] PM: Devfreq: Add Exynos5-bus devfreq driver for Exynos5250 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:35:18 +0900 Message-ID: <24d701ce3024$a52d5310$ef87f930$%kim@samsung.com> References: <17352980.268481359965953092.JavaMail.weblogic@epml13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:28178 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760338Ab3DCEfV (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 00:35:21 -0400 In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: 'Abhilash Kesavan' , myungjoo.ham@samsung.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?J7nasOa5zic=?= , rjw@sisk.pl, =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?J8PWwb7Iryc=?= Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > >> > One concern is that I cannot apply Patch 1/4 directly as the .dts > file isn't > >> > available to me. > >> > Do you intend to apply that patch to another tree and apply the other > three > >> > to devfreq tree? > >> I have been merging the devfreq tree into Kgene's tree for my testing. > I am not > >> sure how this should get in, any suggestions ? > > > > I'd suggest to send Patch 1/4 to Kgene and get it applied first if that > patch is preliminary to the other patchset. If it is not, we can go > seperated and independently. > Thanks for the suggestion. Kgene is a recipient on patches 1 and 2. I > am hoping he'll pick it up soon. However, the devfreq patches are not > dependent on them and can be applied independently. Just note, as I commented, arch side patches should be re-worked and current devfreq in mainline won't cause any problems without the arch side. And I discussed with Abhilash about that, he will finish arch side re- posting next time. Thanks. - Kukjin