From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:10:57 +0200 Message-ID: <2537138.AhdhMFtmoG@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <4063610.TqANq0McE8@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170725100012.GH2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59418 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbdGYQS4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:18:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170725100012.GH2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Greg Kroah-Hartman On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 01:00:12 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:31:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > On one of my test machines nhi_mailbox_cmd() called from icm_suspend() > > times out and returnes an error which then is propagated to the > > caller and causes the entire system suspend to be aborted which isn't > > very useful. > > > > Instead of aborting system suspend, print the error into the log > > and continue. > > I agree, it should not prevent suspend but I wonder why it fails in the > first place? Can you check what is the return value? As per the above, the error is a timeout, ie. -ETIMEDOUT.