linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:16:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2673732.vGhgFDMBON@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1405131139510.1098-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:46:55 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > A wakeup request from the hardware could cause a runtime resume to 
> > > occur at this time.  The barrier wouldn't prevent that.
> > > 
> > > It's unlikely, I agree, but not impossible.
> > 
> > Yeah, I didn't think about that.
> 
> Come to think of it, if the hardware sends a wakeup request then it
> must have been enabled for remote wakeup.  And if the hardware settings
> are appropriate for system suspend then it must be enabled for system
> wakeup.  Consequently a wakeup from the hardware ought to abort the
> system suspend in any case.  So maybe we don't care about this 
> scenario.
> 
> On the other hand, there may be other mechanisms that could cause a 
> runtime resume at this inconvenient time.  A timer routine, for 
> instance.
> 
> > But that also can occur in __device_suspend(), after we've checked the flag
> > and decided not to invoke the ->suspend() callback, right?  So moving the
> > check in there doesn't help much I'd say.  It closes the race window, but
> > that's it.
> > 
> > That means that the whole approach based on ->prepare() is problematic
> > unless we somehow mix it with disabling runtime PM.
> 
> Maybe the call to __pm_runtime_disable() should be moved from
> __device_suspend_late() to __device_suspend(), after the callback has
> been invoked (or skipped, as the case may be).  Then after runtime PM
> has been disabled, you can check the device's status has changed and go
> back to invoke the callback if necessary.

We moved __pm_runtime_disable() to __device_suspend_late() to be able to
use pm_runtime_resume() in __device_suspend() (and we actually do that in
some places now).

But, in principle, we can do __pm_runtime_disable() temporarily in some place
between ->prepare() and ->suspend(), it doesn't matter if that's in
device_prepare() in __device_suspend() really.  Then, we can check the device's
runtime PM status (that'd need to be done carefully to take the disabling into
account) and
(1) if the device is runtime-suspended, set direct_complete for it without
    enabling runtime PM, or
(2) if the device is not runtime-suspended, clear direct_complete for it
    and re-enable runtime PM.
and in case of (1) we would re-enable runtime PM in device_complete().

That should work I suppose?

Of course, question is what ->prepare() is supposed to do then if it needs
to check the state of the device before deciding whether or not to return 1.
I guess it would need to disable runtime PM around that check too.

Rafael


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-13 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-13  1:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] PM / sleep: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Move runtime PM barrier invocation to device_prepare() Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  9:16   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 10:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 10:59       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 15:07         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  9:30   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-05-13 14:49   ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:12       ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:43         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:46           ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 16:16             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-05-13 16:19               ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 21:29                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-14 14:53                   ` Alan Stern
2014-05-15 11:13                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:45                       ` [PATCH 0/3] (was: Re: PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily) Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:46                         ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16 14:27                           ` Alan Stern
2014-05-16 21:10                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:47                         ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Update device PM documentation to cover direct_complete Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16  0:48                         ` [PATCH 3/3][Resend] ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16 22:18                           ` [PATCH 3/3][update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 12:06                     ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily Ulf Hansson
2014-05-15 12:55                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 17:35             ` Kevin Hilman
2014-05-14 22:24   ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 11:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-15 13:09       ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 14:29         ` Alan Stern
2014-05-15  7:03           ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-15 15:58             ` Alan Stern
2014-05-16 15:20               ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-16 21:08                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-19  9:18                   ` Jacob Pan
2014-05-19 19:53                     ` Alan Stern
2014-05-19 20:13                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-19 20:20                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13  1:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 14:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] PM / sleep: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices " Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-13 15:25     ` Alan Stern
2014-05-13 15:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2673732.vGhgFDMBON@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).