From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate: Use C0 time, calculate target pstate directly Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:46:13 +0200 Message-ID: <2686720.CT1omYuSKq@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1428811830-15006-1-git-send-email-dsmythies@telus.net> <002801d07863$591554d0$0b3ffe70$@net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57493 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750820AbbDQAVj (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:21:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <002801d07863$591554d0$0b3ffe70$@net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Smythies , kristen@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, April 16, 2015 09:35:26 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2015.04.11 09:10 Doug Smythies wrote: > > > Patch 1 basically adds better debug information to the > > perf data. It was originally requested in June, and Dirk agreed > > to include it in September. Regardless of the acceptance or > > rejection of this whole patch set, please accept this one. > > scripts/checkpatch.pl complains about one line as over 80 > > characters, not sure how to split the line. > > Please consider to accept patch 1 of 5 for inclusion > in Kernel 4.1RC1. > > I understand the need to do regression and multiple platform > testing on the rest of the patch set, but this one > just adds some useful debug information. Kristen, what do you think? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.