[PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[Kai-Heng Feng]

On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
but device still doesn't get woken up.

Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
subsequent plugging events.

The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after
first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
restriction for CNP can also be removed.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index bd7ef59b1f2e..f0e48f2bc3a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -7021,6 +7021,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
 	int rc;
 
+	pdev->pme_poll = true;
+
 	rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
@@ -7682,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 
 	dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
 
-	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type != e1000_pch_cnp)
+	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
 		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[Alexander H Duyck]

On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 00:25 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
> from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
> but device still doesn't get woken up.

Do we have a root cause on why things don't get woken up? This seems
like an issue where something isn't getting reset after the first
wakeup and so future ones are blocked.

> Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
> firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
> works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
> subsequent plugging events.
> 
> The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
> on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after
> first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
> restriction for CNP can also be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index bd7ef59b1f2e..f0e48f2bc3a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -7021,6 +7021,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	int rc;
>  
> +	pdev->pme_poll = true;
> +
>  	rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;

Doesn't this enable this too broadly. I know there are a number of
devices that run under the e1000e and I would imagine that we don't
want them all running with "pme_poll = true" do we?

It seems like at a minimum we should only be setting this for specific
platofrms or devices instead of on all of them.

Also this seems like something we should be setting on the suspend side
since it seems to be clared in the wakeup calls.

Lastly I am not sure the first one is necessarily succeding. You might
want to check the status of pme_poll before you run your first test.
From what I can tell it looks like the initial state is true in
pci_pm_init. If so it might be getting cleared after the first wakeup
which is what causes your issues.

> @@ -7682,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  
>  	dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
>  
> -	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type != e1000_pch_cnp)
> +	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
>  		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;

I assume this is the original workaround that was put in to address
this issue. Perhaps you should add a Fixes tag to this to identify
which workaround this patch is meant to be replacing.

Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[Kai-Heng Feng]

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:24 AM Alexander H Duyck
<alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 00:25 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
> > from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
> > but device still doesn't get woken up.
>
> Do we have a root cause on why things don't get woken up? This seems
> like an issue where something isn't getting reset after the first
> wakeup and so future ones are blocked.

No we don't know the root cause.
I guess the D3 wake isn't really tested under Windows because I219
doesn't use runtime D3 on Windows.

>
> > Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
> > firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
> > works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
> > subsequent plugging events.
> >
> > The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
> > on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after
> > first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
> > restriction for CNP can also be removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index bd7ef59b1f2e..f0e48f2bc3a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -7021,6 +7021,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >       int rc;
> >
> > +     pdev->pme_poll = true;
> > +
> >       rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
> >       if (rc)
> >               return rc;
>
> Doesn't this enable this too broadly. I know there are a number of
> devices that run under the e1000e and I would imagine that we don't
> want them all running with "pme_poll = true" do we?

Whack a mole isn't scaling, either.
The generation between CNP and ADL are probably affected too.

>
> It seems like at a minimum we should only be setting this for specific
> platofrms or devices instead of on all of them.
>
> Also this seems like something we should be setting on the suspend side
> since it seems to be clared in the wakeup calls.

pme_poll gets cleared on wakeup, and once it's cleared the device will
be removed from pci_pme_list.

To prevent that, reset pme_poll to true immediately on runtime resume.

>
> Lastly I am not sure the first one is necessarily succeding. You might
> want to check the status of pme_poll before you run your first test.
> From what I can tell it looks like the initial state is true in
> pci_pm_init. If so it might be getting cleared after the first wakeup
> which is what causes your issues.

That's by design. pme_poll gets cleared when the hardware is capable
to signal wakeup via PME# or ACPI GPE. For detected hardwares, the
pme_poll will never be cleared.
So this becomes tricky for the issue, since the ACPI GPE works for
just one time, but never again.

>
> > @@ -7682,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> >
> >       dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
> >
> > -     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type != e1000_pch_cnp)
> > +     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
> >               pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> >
> >       return 0;
>
> I assume this is the original workaround that was put in to address
> this issue. Perhaps you should add a Fixes tag to this to identify
> which workaround this patch is meant to be replacing.

Another possibility is to remove runtime power management completely.
I wonder why Windows keep the device at D0 all the time? Can Linux
align with Windows?

Kai-Heng

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[Paul Menzel]

[Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org]

Dear Kai,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 02.06.23 um 03:46 schrieb Kai-Heng Feng:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:24 AM Alexander H Duyck wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 00:25 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>> On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
>>> from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
>>> but device still doesn't get woken up.

Could you please add the list of all the devices with the firmware 
version, you know this problem exists on? Please also add the URLs of 
the bug reports at the end of the commit message.

Is that problem logged somehow? Could a log message be added first?

>> Do we have a root cause on why things don't get woken up? This seems
>> like an issue where something isn't getting reset after the first
>> wakeup and so future ones are blocked.
> 
> No we don't know the root cause.
> I guess the D3 wake isn't really tested under Windows because I219
> doesn't use runtime D3 on Windows.

How do you know? Where you able to look at the Microsoft Windows driver 
source code?

>>> Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
>>> firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
>>> works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
>>> subsequent plugging events.
>>>
>>> The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
>>> on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after

The verb is spelled with a space: work around.

>>> first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
>>> restriction for CNP can also be removed.

When was that restriction for CNP added?

>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>> index bd7ef59b1f2e..f0e48f2bc3a2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>> @@ -7021,6 +7021,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>        struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>        int rc;
>>>
>>> +     pdev->pme_poll = true;
>>> +
>>>        rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
>>>        if (rc)
>>>                return rc;
>>
>> Doesn't this enable this too broadly. I know there are a number of
>> devices that run under the e1000e and I would imagine that we don't
>> want them all running with "pme_poll = true" do we?
> 
> Whack a mole isn't scaling, either.
> The generation between CNP and ADL are probably affected too.
> 
>> It seems like at a minimum we should only be setting this for specific
>> platofrms or devices instead of on all of them.
>>
>> Also this seems like something we should be setting on the suspend side
>> since it seems to be cleared in the wakeup calls.
> 
> pme_poll gets cleared on wakeup, and once it's cleared the device will
> be removed from pci_pme_list.
> 
> To prevent that, reset pme_poll to true immediately on runtime resume.
> 
>> Lastly I am not sure the first one is necessarily succeeding. You might
>> want to check the status of pme_poll before you run your first test.
>> From what I can tell it looks like the initial state is true in
>> pci_pm_init. If so it might be getting cleared after the first wakeup
>> which is what causes your issues.
> 
> That's by design. pme_poll gets cleared when the hardware is capable
> to signal wakeup via PME# or ACPI GPE. For detected hardwares, the
> pme_poll will never be cleared.
> So this becomes tricky for the issue, since the ACPI GPE works for
> just one time, but never again.
> 
>>> @@ -7682,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>>
>>>        dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
>>>
>>> -     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type != e1000_pch_cnp)
>>> +     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
>>>                pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>>        return 0;
>>
>> I assume this is the original workaround that was put in to address
>> this issue. Perhaps you should add a Fixes tag to this to identify
>> which workaround this patch is meant to be replacing.
> 
> Another possibility is to remove runtime power management completely.
> I wonder why Windows keep the device at D0 all the time?

Who knows how to contact Intel’s driver developers for Microsoft Windows?

> Can Linux align with Windows?

Before deciding this, the power usage in the different states should be 
measured.


Kind regards,

Paul

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[Kai-Heng Feng]

Hi Paul,

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> [Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org]
>
> Dear Kai,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 02.06.23 um 03:46 schrieb Kai-Heng Feng:
> > On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:24 AM Alexander H Duyck wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 00:25 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> >>> On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
> >>> from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
> >>> but device still doesn't get woken up.
>
> Could you please add the list of all the devices with the firmware
> version, you know this problem exists on? Please also add the URLs of
> the bug reports at the end of the commit message.

Firmware do you mean the firmware on I219 device, or BIOS?

>
> Is that problem logged somehow? Could a log message be added first?

There's nothing gets logged. When this happens the ACPI GPE is dead silent.

>
> >> Do we have a root cause on why things don't get woken up? This seems
> >> like an issue where something isn't getting reset after the first
> >> wakeup and so future ones are blocked.
> >
> > No we don't know the root cause.
> > I guess the D3 wake isn't really tested under Windows because I219
> > doesn't use runtime D3 on Windows.
>
> How do you know? Where you able to look at the Microsoft Windows driver
> source code?

Device Manager shows the current PCI state.

>
> >>> Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
> >>> firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
> >>> works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
> >>> subsequent plugging events.
> >>>
> >>> The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
> >>> on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after
>
> The verb is spelled with a space: work around.

Sure, will change it.

>
> >>> first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
> >>> restriction for CNP can also be removed.
>
> When was that restriction for CNP added?

The restriction for CNP+ was introduced by commit 459d69c407f9
("e1000e: Disable runtime PM on CNP+") and modified by 3335369bad99
("e1000e: Remove the runtime suspend restriction on CNP+").

>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
> >>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> >>> index bd7ef59b1f2e..f0e48f2bc3a2 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> >>> @@ -7021,6 +7021,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>>        struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >>>        int rc;
> >>>
> >>> +     pdev->pme_poll = true;
> >>> +
> >>>        rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
> >>>        if (rc)
> >>>                return rc;
> >>
> >> Doesn't this enable this too broadly. I know there are a number of
> >> devices that run under the e1000e and I would imagine that we don't
> >> want them all running with "pme_poll = true" do we?
> >
> > Whack a mole isn't scaling, either.
> > The generation between CNP and ADL are probably affected too.
> >
> >> It seems like at a minimum we should only be setting this for specific
> >> platofrms or devices instead of on all of them.
> >>
> >> Also this seems like something we should be setting on the suspend side
> >> since it seems to be cleared in the wakeup calls.
> >
> > pme_poll gets cleared on wakeup, and once it's cleared the device will
> > be removed from pci_pme_list.
> >
> > To prevent that, reset pme_poll to true immediately on runtime resume.
> >
> >> Lastly I am not sure the first one is necessarily succeeding. You might
> >> want to check the status of pme_poll before you run your first test.
> >> From what I can tell it looks like the initial state is true in
> >> pci_pm_init. If so it might be getting cleared after the first wakeup
> >> which is what causes your issues.
> >
> > That's by design. pme_poll gets cleared when the hardware is capable
> > to signal wakeup via PME# or ACPI GPE. For detected hardwares, the
> > pme_poll will never be cleared.
> > So this becomes tricky for the issue, since the ACPI GPE works for
> > just one time, but never again.
> >
> >>> @@ -7682,7 +7684,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> >>>
> >>>        dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
> >>>
> >>> -     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type != e1000_pch_cnp)
> >>> +     if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))
> >>>                pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> >>>
> >>>        return 0;
> >>
> >> I assume this is the original workaround that was put in to address
> >> this issue. Perhaps you should add a Fixes tag to this to identify
> >> which workaround this patch is meant to be replacing.
> >
> > Another possibility is to remove runtime power management completely.
> > I wonder why Windows keep the device at D0 all the time?
>
> Who knows how to contact Intel’s driver developers for Microsoft Windows?

Probably this mailing list?

>
> > Can Linux align with Windows?
>
> Before deciding this, the power usage in the different states should be
> measured.

The power usage doesn't matter if the device can't function properly.

Kai-Heng

>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake

[naamax.meir]

On 6/1/2023 19:25, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On some I219 devices, ethernet cable plugging detection only works once
> from PCI D3 state. Subsequent cable plugging does set PME bit correctly,
> but device still doesn't get woken up.
> 
> Since I219 connects to the root complex directly, it relies on platform
> firmware (ACPI) to wake it up. In this case, the GPE from _PRW only
> works for first cable plugging but fails to notify the driver for
> subsequent plugging events.
> 
> The issue was originally found on CNP, but the same issue can be found
> on ADL too. So workaround the issue by continuing use PME poll after
> first ACPI wake. As PME poll is always used, the runtime suspend
> restriction for CNP can also be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>