From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC] cpufreq: Add ->get_rate() driver callback Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <28217457.CjEUhGD9I3@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1709328.yilXR0UZlG@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150730094721.GA9121@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49167 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750884AbbG3T6i (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:58:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150730094721.GA9121@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, open list On Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:17:21 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-07-15, 01:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > *You* can do them faily quickly. Say if all of the outstanding cpufreq > > patches are queued up for 4.3, then it will be the time to submit more. > > Otherwise I'll just have an ever growing queue of patches to process > > which won't speed up things at all. > > Lots of pending stuff is already committed. Would you like me to send > these now? OK > Also, how should I send them? I mean, you want separate patches for > drivers? Or all of them in a single patch. This is how stats may look: A single patch for all of them, please. Thanks, Rafael