linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)" <Chun-Jen.Tseng@mediatek.com>
To: "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "cw00.choi@samsung.com" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	"myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 05:32:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a73b5ca35692c8ffa68c9ff0df73e24a592967d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321045624.mwm2mnkqeow5uids@vireshk-i7>

Hi viresh,

I add a global lock related to the CCI driver.

This is because the CCI needs to obtain the frequencies of policy-0 and
policy-6 to determine its own frequency.

If policy-0 and policy-6 are set simultaneously, it may cause the CCI
to select the wrong frequency.

Therefore, I hope to change the setting flow to the following:
   policy-0 or policy-6 -> set frequency -> CCI receives notification -
> set CCI frequency

BRs,

Mark Tseng

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 10:26 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 20-03-25, 08:22, Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁) wrote:
> > The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info instance is per-policy and the
> > reg_lock is
> > also in this structure. when I have two "policy-0" and "policy-6"
> > use
> > the same mtk_cpufreq_set_target() function but the info->reg_lock
> > is from 2 instance(policy-0 and policy-6). when the policy-0 and
> > policy-6 call set_target target, the mutex_lock is locked by per-
> > policy. So, I change to global lock avoid per-policy lock.
> 
> Yes, that's what you are doing. I am asking why a global lock is
> required here ?
> I think the per-policy lock is all you need.
> 
> --
> viresh


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  7:43 [PATCH v3 0/3] fixed mediatek-cpufreq has multi policy concurrency issue Mark Tseng
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:42   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-20  8:22     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-21  4:56       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-21  5:32         ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁) [this message]
2025-03-21  6:01           ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-24  3:21             ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-24  5:43               ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-14  8:42                 ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-04-16  8:05                   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-28 13:26                     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-08-29  5:47                       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-19  7:23   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-20  8:25     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-20  8:34     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-21  4:59       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpufreq: mediatek: data safety protect Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:49   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a73b5ca35692c8ffa68c9ff0df73e24a592967d.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=chun-jen.tseng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).